Both cagrilintide and a similar peptide called KBP-336 activate the same two receptors that control appetite and metabolism, but KBP-336 leans more toward the calcitonin receptor. In rats, this bias makes KBP-336 cause slightly more weight loss and better blood‑sugar control than cagrilintide, especially at higher doses.

Cagrilintide is a novel long-acting amylin receptor agonist, which has shown a potent induction of weight loss. Interestingly, cagrilintide is a Dual Amylin and Calcitonin Receptor Agonist (DACRA) derived from an amylin backbone. Another class of long-acting DACRAs exists, namely the KBPs. These are salmon calcitonin-based and have shown preclinical potential; however, how and if they differentiate from amylin-derived molecules remain to be studied. Here, we compare cagrilintide to the DACRA KBP-336 with respect to receptor activation balance in vitro and using metabolic in vivo models. Peptide potencies were assessed using receptor-specific assays in vitro and in vivo. In vivo efficacies on body weight and glucose homeostasis were investigated head-to-head in high-fat diet (HFD) fed obese and T2D (ZDF) rat models. Both peptides activate the amylin and the calcitonin receptor in vitro and in vivo, with KBP-336 being more potent, and showing a CTR bias. KBP-336 and cagrilintide induced a potent and dose-dependent weight loss in HFD rats, with the highest dose of KBP-336 being superior to cagrilintide. In diabetic ZDF rats, DACRA treatment improved fasting blood glucose, HbA1c levels, and insulin action, with KBP-336 being superior to cagrilintide in improving glucose control. In summary, both KBP-336 and cagrilintide are DACRAs, however with KBP-336 being biased towards the CTR resulting in a different receptor activation balance. Interestingly, KBP-336 showed superior long-term efficacy on both weight loss and glucose control, supporting relevance of the receptor balance, and highlighting KBP-336 as a promising agent for the treatment of obesity and T2D.