The local expression and abundance of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding proteins in skeletal muscle are regulated by age and gender but not local IGF-I in vivo.
Oliver. William T WT; Rosenberger. Judy J; Lopez. Rusmely R; Gomez. Adam A; Cummings. Kathleen K KK; Fiorotto. Marta L ML
Key Findings
- Muscle‑specific IGF‑I overexpression boosts muscle mass by ~20% without altering IGFBP levels
- IGFBP‑3,‑4,‑5,‑6 show age‑ and gender‑dependent changes, independent of local IGF‑I
- LR3‑IGF‑I activates the IGF‑1 receptor more effectively than native IGF‑I in young mice
Practical Outcomes
- LR3‑IGF‑I appears to be a more potent way to trigger IGF‑1 signaling than regular IGF‑I, suggesting it may be a better choice for those seeking muscle growth. Since extra IGF‑I doesn’t suppress IGFBPs, you likely don’t need to worry about manipulating binding proteins when using IGF‑I or LR3‑IGF‑I. Age and sex may affect IGFBP levels, but they don’t seem to blunt the muscle’s response to IGF‑I.
Summary
In mice that make extra IGF‑I in their muscles, muscle size grew about 20% and stayed larger, but the levels of proteins that normally bind IGF (IGFBPs) didn’t change because of the extra IGF‑I. Instead, IGFBP levels shifted with age and sex. A modified IGF‑I called LR3‑IGF‑I turned on the IGF‑1 receptor more strongly than regular IGF‑I, no matter the mouse’s age, sex, or genetics.
Abstract
We wished to determine whether sustained IGF-I production in skeletal muscle increases local IGF binding protein (IGFBP) abundance, thereby mitigating the long-term stimulation of muscle growth by IGF-I. Muscle growth of transgenic mice that overexpress IGF-I in muscle (SIS2) and of wild-type (Wt) mice was compared. At 3, 5, 10, and 20 wk of age, hind-limb muscle weights and IGFBP-3, -4, -5, and -6 mRNA and protein abundances were quantified. Additional mice were injected with IGF-I or LR3-IGF-I, and phosphorylation of the type 1 IGF receptor (IGF-1R) was compared. Muscle mass was 20% greater in SIS2 compared with Wt mice by 10 wk of age (P < 0.01), and this difference was maintained to 20 wk. IGFBP mRNA and protein abundances were unaffected by genotype. IGFBP-4 and -5 protein abundances increased with age, whereas for IGFBP-3 and -6, there was a sexual dimorphic response (P < 0.01); after 5 wk of age, IGFBP-3 decreased in males but increased in females, whereas IGFBP-6 decreased in females and remained unchanged in males. These protein expression patterns resulted from differences at both the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels. LR3-IGF-I stimulated IGF-1R phosphorylation to a greater extent than IGF-I at both 5 and 10 wk of age (P < 0.01), regardless of gender or genotype (P > 0.21). Thus, variations in local IGF-I levels do not appear to regulate muscle IGFBP expression. The age- and gender-specific differences in muscle IGFBP expression are not sufficient to alter the response of the muscle to the IGFs but may impact the IGF-independent effects of these IGFBPs.
Study Information
pubmed
2005
2005-09-15T00:00:00.000Z
10.1210/en.2005-0714