Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Semaglutide

Ozempic, Rybelsus, Wegovy

Quick Stats
Studies 78
Trials 100
Score 2
2025 pubmed

A critical review of natural products driven correction of bile acid dysregulation: a therapeutic strategy for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Peng. Qing Q; Hao. Liyuan L; Li. Shenghao S; Yu. Fei F; Li. Na N; Hu. Xiaoyu X

Key Findings

  • Bile‑acid imbalance is a key driver of NAFLD progression
  • Semaglutide and other approved drugs have limited efficacy and notable side effects
  • Various natural product classes (flavonoids, curcuminoids, saponins, etc.) can modulate bile‑acid pathways and gut microbiota in pre‑clinical models

Practical Outcomes

  • For biohackers, the take‑away is that certain plant‑based supplements (e.g., curcumin, flavonoid‑rich extracts, berberine) might support liver health by targeting bile‑acid metabolism, but the evidence is still early and mostly animal‑based. Use these as adjuncts to a liver‑friendly diet and gut‑health strategies, and monitor any effects closely; don’t rely on them as a replacement for proven medical therapies.

Summary

This review says that while drugs like semaglutide can help fatty liver disease, they often cause stomach problems and don’t work well on scar tissue. Natural compounds from plants and traditional medicines might improve liver health by fixing bile‑acid balance and gut microbes, but most studies are in animals and human data are mixed. More solid human trials are needed before these can be recommended as reliable treatments.

Abstract

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) represents a significant global health challenge. While two drugs (semaglutide, resmetirom) have recently been approved for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), their clinical utility is constrained by gastrointestinal side effects, insufficient efficacy against fibrosis, and dose-related adverse events. Similarly, obeticholic acid (OCA), a farnesoid X receptor (FXR) agonist with antifibrotic potential, is associated with significant side effects, including severe pruritus. Dysregulation of bile acid (BA) metabolism is a central driver of NAFLD progression, characterized by imbalances in synthesis, impaired enterohepatic circulation, and aberrant nuclear receptor signaling. Certain hydrophobic BAs contribute to hepatocyte apoptosis, oxidative stress, and inflammation, thereby exacerbating liver injury. Targeting BA homeostasis is thus a promising therapeutic strategy, with natural products emerging as attractive candidates due to their multi-target actions and favorable safety profiles. This review summarizes 10 major classes of natural products, including traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formulas, flavonoids, saccharides, saponins, alkaloids, curcuminoids, lignans, iridoid glycosides, sterols/terpenoids, and phenolic acids/other phenolics, that alleviate NAFLD by regulating BA metabolism. These agents modulate BA-sensing receptors, reshape the gut microbiota to optimize BA conversion, and regulate key BA transporters and enzymes. Compared with synthetic drugs, natural products offer broader efficacy, lower toxicity, and greater adaptability to the heterogeneity of NAFLD. However, significant limitations persist. Preclinical studies rely heavily on single-sex rodent models, while clinical evidence remains inconsistent. Crucially, mechanistic causality, such as the interplay between the gut microbiota and BAs, lacks rigorous validation through methods like fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) or gene knockout studies. Furthermore, challenges in metabolite standardization and dose rationality hinder clinical translation. Future research must prioritize human-relevant models, large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with histological endpoints, and robust causal validation. By addressing these gaps, natural products targeting BA metabolism hold great promise to complement or replace existing therapies, offering safer and more effective personalized treatments for NAFLD.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2025

Date

2025-11-21T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.3389/fphar.2025.1640873

References

141