Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Semaglutide

Ozempic, Rybelsus, Wegovy

Quick Stats
Studies 78
Trials 100
Score 3
2025 pubmed

The effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) on alcohol-related outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sinha. Binayak B; Ghosal. Samit S

Key Findings

  • Randomized trials found no statistically significant drop in alcohol consumption or craving with GLP‑1RAs, though semaglutide showed a modest craving reduction (p=0.024).
  • Observational studies reported a 36% lower risk of alcohol‑related events (HR 0.64) among users of GLP‑1RAs, consistent across AUD and SUD groups.
  • Current evidence is mixed; larger, well‑designed RCTs are required to confirm any true benefit.

Practical Outcomes

  • If you’re already using semaglutide for weight or metabolic health, you might see a slight side benefit on alcohol‑related outcomes, but the data aren’t strong enough to base a drinking‑reduction plan on it. Keep an eye on future larger trials before adding it specifically for alcohol control.

Summary

Studies looked at whether GLP‑1 drugs like semaglutide can help people drink less or feel less craving. The small clinical trials didn’t show a clear drop in how much people drank or their cravings, though semaglutide hinted at a small craving benefit. Big real‑world data sets did show about a 30‑40% lower chance of alcohol‑related problems for people on these drugs. More big trials are needed to be sure.

Abstract

To evaluate the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on alcohol-related outcomes in adults with or without alcohol use disorder (AUD). A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to May 3, 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies assessing GLP-1RAs (e.g., Semaglutide, Liraglutide, Exenatide, and Dulaglutide) versus placebo, no treatment, or other interventions in adults. Outcomes were alcohol consumption (defined as total intake or drinks per drinking day, measured as standardised mean difference [SMD]), alcohol craving (SMD), and alcohol-related events (hazard ratio [HR]). Random-effects models with Restricted Maximum Likelihood estimation and Hartung-Knapp adjustment were used. Separate AUD and SUD meta-analyses addressed outcome heterogeneity, with intoxication reported narratively. Three RCTs (N = 430) and six observational studies (N = 2,740,207) were included. RCTs showed non-significant reductions in alcohol consumption (SMD: -0.24, 95% CI: -0.70, 0.23), drinks per drinking day (SMD: -0.23, 95% CI: -0.64, 0.19), and craving (SMD: -0.14, 95% CI: -2.84, 2.55), with Semaglutide showing greater craving reduction (p = 0.024). Observational studies showed reduced alcohol-related events (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.59-0.69, p < 0.001), with separate analyses confirming effects for AUD (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.63-0.70) and SUD (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.18-2.48), and intoxication (HR: 0.50). Semaglutide and GIP/GLP-1RAs had more potent effects (p < 0.001). Observational studies suggest a decrease in alcohol-related events, but RCTs have effects on alcohol consumption and craving that remain non-significant. Larger RCTs are needed. CRD420251045294.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2025

Date

2025-12-05T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1186/s13722-025-00637-z

References

20