Effect of delta sleep inducing peptide (DSIP) and arginine vasotocin (AVT) on sleep and motor activity in the rat.
Tobler. I I; Borbély. A A AA
Key Findings
- Systemic DSIP (40‑160 nmol/kg) did not significantly increase sleep or delta‑band EEG power in rats.
- AVT injected into brain ventricles (10⁻¹⁵‑10⁻¹⁹ mol) also failed to enhance sleep or delta‑band power.
- Very high DSIP dose (160 nmol/kg) reduced dark‑time activity 1‑2 days later, while a lower dose (80 nmol/kg) briefly increased activity; tiny AVT doses reduced delta‑band power.
Practical Outcomes
- For biohackers, DSIP is unlikely to be an effective sleep aid and there’s no proven dosing protocol. The study suggests you may see minor, unpredictable changes in activity at extreme doses, but overall the peptide offers no clear benefit for sleep or performance enhancement.
Summary
In rats, giving Delta Sleep Inducing Peptide (DSIP) or arginine vasotocin (AVT) did not reliably make the animals sleep more or boost the deep‑sleep brain waves. Only tiny, inconsistent changes in activity or brain‑wave power were seen at very high or ultra‑low doses, and the researchers concluded neither peptide works as a specific sleep‑promoting drug.
Abstract
The effect of Delta Sleep Inducing Peptide (DSIP) and arginine vasotocin (AVT) on motor activity and sleep was investigated in the rat. Motor activity was not significantly reduced during the 24 h following systemic DSIP administration (40-160 nmol/kg i.p.), nor were sleep and the power of the EEG delta-band significantly increased in the 2 hours following injection or infusion of DSIP into the lateral or third ventricle (7-24 nmol). Injection or infusion of AVT into the lateral or third ventricle (10(-15)-10(-19) mol) did not enhance sleep and the power of the EEG delta-band. Nevertheless, the following significant effects indicate an unspecified biological action of the peptides: Dark-time motor activity was reduced 1 and 2 days after DSIP administration (160 nmol/kg), and the activity in the first 4 h after injection (80 nmol/kg) was increased. In addition, the power in the delta-band was reduced after administration of DISP (7 nmol) and AVT (10(-17) mol) into the third ventricle. Thus exceedingly small doses of AVT seem to exert not only endocrine, but also electrophysiological effects. It is concluded that neither DSIP nor AVT qualify as a specific sleep-promoting substance.
Study Information
pubmed
1980