Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

DSIP

Emideltide, DSIP nonapeptide, Delta sleep-inducing peptide

Quick Stats
Studies 458
Trials 82
Score 2
2013 pubmed

[Delta-sleep inducing peptide entrapment and release from polymer hydrogels based on modified polyvinyl alcohol in vitro].

Sukhanova. T V TV; Artiukhov. A A AA; Prudchenko. I A IA; Golunova. A S AS; Seminikhina. M A MA; Shtil'man. M I MI; Markvicheva. E A EA

Key Findings

  • Macroporous (cryogel) PVA hydrogels released 64‑74% of DSIP within 30 minutes and completed release in about 3 hours.
  • Isotropic (non‑porous) PVA hydrogels showed virtually no DSIP release even after 48 hours.
  • Drying the hydrogels altered release: lyophilized samples released 63% in 30 minutes, but air‑drying for 3 days caused significant peptide loss.

Practical Outcomes

  • If you want a fast, short‑term DSIP boost, a porous PVA hydrogel could serve as a quick‑release carrier. For prolonged retention (or to avoid release), a dense isotropic PVA gel may hold the peptide but may not deliver it effectively. However, the study is in vitro and does not provide a ready‑to‑use dosing protocol for humans.

Summary

Researchers tested how a sleep‑related peptide (DSIP) can be trapped in different kinds of PVA‑based gels and how fast it comes out. The porous gels let the peptide spill out quickly (within minutes to a few hours), while the dense, non‑porous gels kept the peptide locked in even after two days.

Abstract

The aim of the study was to entrap delta-sleep inducing peptide (DSIP) in cross-linked poly(vinyl alcohol)-based hydrogels of different structures and to evaluate peptide release kinetics from these hydrogels using an in vitro model. Isotropic and macroporous hydrogels on the basis of poly(vinyl alcohol) acrylic derivative (Acr-PVA) as well as macroporous hydogels containing epoxy groups which were synthesized by copolymerization of this monomer with glycidyl methacrylate. The isotropic hydrogels were fabricated at positive temperatures while the macroporous hydrogels (cryogels) were prepared at the temperatures below zero. The peptide was entrapped into macroporous modified PVA hydrogels by addition of a peptide solution on previously fabricated matrices, while into PVA-GMA hydrogels containing epoxy groups peptide immobilization was carried out by incubation of hydrogel matrices in the peptide solution. In the case of isotropic hydrogels the peptide was added into the polymer mixture at a hydrogel formation reaction. The peptide release kinetics was studied by incubation of hydrogels in PBS (pH 7.4), in physiological solution (0.9% NaCl) and in water. DSIP concentration in supernatants was determined by phase-reverse HPLC. DSIP release from the macroporous PVA hydrogel after 30 min incubation was 74, 70 and 64% in water, PBS and 0.9% NaCl, relatively, and it was completed in 3 hs. From the isotropic hydrogel the release neither peptide nor products of its degradation was not observed even after 48 hs of incubation. For freshly prepared hydrogel the release kinetics was as follows: 27 and 78% in 30 and 33 hs, relatively. In the case of the lyophilized hydrogel samples the peptide release was 63% in 30 min incubation while drying patterns at room temperature for 3 days resulted in significant peptide loss because its structure damage.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2013

DOI

10.18097/pbmc20135901065