Permeability of the blood-brain barrier to neuropeptides: the case for penetration.
Banks. W A WA; Kastin. A J AJ
Key Findings
- Blood levels of many peptides match cerebrospinal fluid levels, and giving them peripherally can affect the brain.
- Peptide BBB penetration is mainly a non‑competitive, non‑saturable process governed by physicochemical traits (lipophilicity, charge, molecular weight, protein binding).
- A minority of peptides use a competitive transport system; large pores/pinocytosis are minor, and aluminum exposure can increase BBB permeability to lipophilic peptides.
Practical Outcomes
- When choosing peptides for brain‑related benefits, favor small, lipophilic, low‑charge molecules or design analogs that enhance these properties. High doses won’t necessarily boost brain entry because the route isn’t saturable. Avoid relying on large peptide drugs for CNS effects, and be cautious about aluminum exposure as it can alter barrier permeability.
Summary
The paper reviews evidence that many peptide hormones can get into the brain from the bloodstream. How well they cross depends on their size, charge, fat‑solubility and how tightly they bind proteins. Most get through by a passive, non‑saturable route, while a few use specific transporters. Big pores or cell‑eating processes aren’t important, and aluminum can temporarily make the barrier more leaky to fat‑soluble peptides.
Abstract
Evidence that peptides can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is reviewed. Penetration is suggested by the observations that blood levels correlate with cerebrospinal fluid levels for many peptides and that peripheral administration of peptides results in effects on the CNS. Passage is confirmed by experiments involving administration of a peptide (immunoactive or radioactive) in one compartment and identification of its appearance in the other, supported by such methods as selective labeling, cross-reactivity with highly specific antibodies, and chromatography. The degree of passage varies among peptides and their analogs. The major route of passage is probably by a non-competitive, non-saturable mechanism, wih the physicochemical characteristics of the peptide (e.g. lipophilicity, charge, molecular weight, and protein binding) determining the degree of passage. A competitive transport mechanism also exists for some peptides. Penetration of the BBB via large pores or by pinocytosis does not appear to be of major importance for peptides. Permeability of the BBB to peptides, but not to the larger iodinated albumin, is affected by intraperitoneal administration of aluminum, apparently by an increase in the permeability of the membrane to lipophilic materials.
Study Information
pubmed
1985
1985-12-31T00:00:00.000Z
10.1016/0306-4530(85)90079-4
123
109