Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

DSIP

Emideltide, DSIP nonapeptide, Delta sleep-inducing peptide

Quick Stats
Studies 458
Trials 82
Score 1
1983 pubmed 49 citations

Comparison of the effects of two 'sleep' peptides, delta sleep-inducing peptide and arginine-vasotocin, on single neurons in the rat and rabbit brain stem.

Normanton. J R JR; Gent. J P JP

Key Findings

  • Both DSP and AVT mainly excite brain‑stem neurons in rats and rabbits.
  • DSP triggers short, dose‑dependent responses and does not desensitize with repeated applications.
  • AVT produces very long‑lasting responses but shows strong desensitization after repeated use.
  • No correlation was found between neurons responsive to DSP and those responsive to AVT, indicating different mechanisms.

Practical Outcomes

  • For biohackers, the research provides basic insight that these peptides affect brain cells differently, but it offers no dosage guidance, safety data, or human‑relevant protocols. The findings suggest that using DSP might give brief, repeatable effects, whereas AVT could lead to prolonged effects that diminish with repeated use, yet neither peptide is ready for practical self‑experimentation.

Summary

The study looked at how two brain‑active peptides, delta sleep‑inducing peptide (DSP) and arginine‑vasotocin (AVT), affect individual nerve cells in the brain stem of rats and rabbits. Both peptides mostly excited the cells, but DSP caused short, dose‑dependent bursts without losing effect over repeated use, while AVT produced long‑lasting responses that faded with repeated exposure. The researchers found no clear link between cells that responded to one peptide and those that responded to the other, suggesting they work through different mechanisms.

Abstract

The effects of delta sleep-inducing peptide and arginine-vasotocin were assessed on single neurons in the nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis of the brain stem in rats and rabbits. Both peptides showed predominantly excitatory actions in both species when applied by microiontophoresis. A small proportion of cells was inhibited by delta sleep-inducing peptide in the rat. Responses to delta sleep-inducing peptide were short-lasting, dose-dependent and showed no significant desensitization to repeated applications. Responses to arginine-vasotocin were of very long time course and showed profound desensitization. No statistically significant correlation was seen between cells responsive to delta sleep-inducing peptide and those responsive to arginine-vasotocin. We conclude that both 'sleep' peptides have similar actions on central neurons and that they are active in both rats and rabbits. However, no evidence was found to suggest a common mechanism of action for both substances.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

1983

Date

1983-01-31T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1016/0306-4522(83)90029-5

Citations

49

References

19