Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

DSIP

Emideltide, DSIP nonapeptide, Delta sleep-inducing peptide

Quick Stats
Studies 458
Trials 82
Score 3
1981 pubmed 54 citations

Permeability of blood-brain barrier to DSIP peptides.

Kastin. A J AJ; Nissen. C C; Coy. D H DH

Key Findings

  • Both natural DSIP and the synthetic analog [D‑Ala3]‑DSIP were detected in rat brain after peripheral injection, proving they cross the blood‑brain barrier.
  • The synthetic analog entered the brain at much higher levels than the natural peptide, suggesting it is transported more efficiently.
  • Control experiments ruled out that the brain signal was just leftover peptide in the blood, confirming true BBB transport.

Practical Outcomes

  • Peripheral dosing of DSIP (e.g., subcutaneous or intranasal) may still influence brain activity, so biohackers don’t necessarily need direct brain administration. The synthetic analog appears to be a more effective way to get the peptide into the brain, but human data are lacking, so start with low doses and monitor effects. More research is needed before precise dosing guidelines can be set.

Summary

The study shows that the sleep‑inducing peptide DSIP can move from the bloodstream into the brain in rats, especially a synthetic version called [D‑Ala3]‑DSIP, which gets into the brain even better. This means that taking DSIP by injection or possibly other peripheral routes could still affect brain function, not just stay in the blood.

Abstract

An improved radioimmunoassay (RIA) for delta sleep-inducing peptide (DSIP) was used to study the permeability of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) to DSIP peptides. Although the synthetic analog [D-Ala3]-DSIP reacts fully in the assay, at least 8 of the 9 amino acids of the naturally occurring DSIP sequence are required for recognition by the antibody. A significant increase in DSIP-like immunoreactivity found in rat brain in one part of the study after peripheral injection of DSIP indicated, therefore, that some peptide crossed the BBB. The much higher levels found in brain tissue after intracarotid administration of [D-Ala3]-DSIP as compared with DSIP made it unlikely that non-specific leakage of peptide across the BBB was the only explanation. Furthermore, the findings after infusion with saline for one minute tended to rule out contamination of brain tissue by peptide remaining in blood. Thus, the results provide additional evidence that one of the ways peptides administered peripherally can influence the brain is by transport across the BBB essentially intact.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

1981

Date

1981-12-01T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1016/0091-3057(81)90061-7

Citations

54

References

14