Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

GHK-Cu

Copper Tripeptide-1, Glycyl-L-Histidyl-L-Lysine Copper, Prezatide Copper

Quick Stats
Studies 149
Trials 1
Score 2
2011 pubmed 94 citations

Thermodynamic study of Cu2+ binding to the DAHK and GHK peptides by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) with the weaker competitor glycine.

Trapaidze. Ana A; Hureau. Christelle C; Bal. Wojciech W; Winterhalter. Mathias M; Faller. Peter P

Key Findings

  • DAHK and GHK bind Cu(II) with extremely high affinity (≈2.6 × 10⁻¹⁴ M and 7.0 × 10⁻¹⁴ M respectively) at physiological pH.
  • The thermodynamic signatures differ: GHK binding is driven more by enthalpy, while DAHK has a distinct entropic contribution.
  • Including a weak competitor like glycine in ITC experiments yields reliable binding data for high‑affinity peptides.

Practical Outcomes

  • The study confirms that GHK is a very strong copper carrier, supporting its use in supplements or skin products that aim to deliver copper. However, it doesn’t provide new dosing guidelines or direct performance benefits, so it mainly reinforces existing knowledge rather than offering new protocols.

Summary

Scientists measured how tightly two natural copper‑binding peptides, DAHK and GHK, grab onto copper ions. They found both bind copper very strongly (in the 10‑14 M range) and that the way they do it (energy‑wise) is slightly different. Using a weak competitor (glycine) helped get accurate numbers.

Abstract

The peptides Asp-Ala-His-Lys (DAHK) and Gly-His-Lys (GHK) are naturally occurring Cu(II)-chelating motifs in human serum and cerebrospinal fluid. Here, the sensitive thermodynamic technique isothermal titration calorimetry was used to study the energetics of Cu(II) binding to DAHK and GHK peptides in the presence of the weaker ligand glycine as a competitor. DAHK and GHK bind Cu(II) predominantly in a 1:1 stoichiometry with conditional dissociation constants [i.e., at pH 7.4, in the absence of the competing chelators glycine and 2-(4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazinyl)ethanesulfonic acid buffer] of 2.6 ± 0.4 × 10(-14) M and 7.0 ± 1.0 × 10(-14) M, respectively. Furthermore, the apparent ΔH values were measured and the number of protons released upon Cu(II) binding was determined by performing experiments in different buffers. This allowed us to determine the conditional ΔG, ΔH, and ΔS, i.e., corrected for the contributions of the weaker ligand glycine and the buffer at pH 7.4. We found that the entropic and enthalpic contributions to the Cu(II) binding to GHK and DAHK are distinct, with a enthalpic contribution for GHK. The thermodynamic parameters obtained correspond well to those in the literature obtained by other techniques, suggesting that the use of the weaker ligand glycine as a competitor in isothermal titration calorimetry provides accurate data for Cu(II) binding to high-affinity peptides, which cannot be accurately determined without the use of a competitor ligand.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2011

Date

2011-09-04T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1007/s00775-011-0824-5

Citations

94

References

58