GHRP-6
Growth Hormone Releasing Peptide-6, Growth hormone-releasing hexapeptide, His-D-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2
Differential impact of a ghrelin receptor antagonist or inverse agonist in the electrical kindling model of epilepsy.
Beheshti. Siamak S; Ershadi. Shiva S; Zamani. Fatemeh F; Azimzadeh. Mansour M; Wesal. Mohammad Wasil MW
Key Findings
- Ghrelin receptor antagonism (D‑Lys‑3‑GHRP‑6) increased seizure severity and could trigger status epilepticus in a rat model.
- Ghrelin receptor inverse agonism (D‑SP) decreased seizure duration and severity in a dose‑dependent manner.
- The same receptor can produce opposite outcomes depending on whether it is blocked or its activity is reduced below baseline.
Practical Outcomes
- If you are considering ghrelin‑targeting compounds for weight loss or metabolic benefits, be aware that antagonists might raise seizure risk, especially if you have a predisposition. Inverse agonists show promise for seizure control, but they are still experimental and not ready for human use. Use caution and monitor neurological symptoms when experimenting with ghrelin‑related peptides.
Summary
In a rat study, blocking the ghrelin receptor with a compound called D-Lys-3‑GHRP‑6 made seizures worse, while another compound that acts as an inverse agonist (D‑SP) reduced seizure severity. The effects depended on the dose given. This shows that different ways of targeting the ghrelin system can have opposite impacts on brain excitability.
Abstract
Ghrelin is a peptide, which has been shown to affect seizures. However, there is not a consensus about its real impact on the control of seizure severity. We assessed the influence of intra-amygdala injections of a ghrelin receptor (GHSR) antagonist, as well as a GHSR inverse agonist on the electrical kindling-induced seizures. Two unipolar electrodes and a tripolar electrode twisted with a guide cannula were implanted in the skull surface or the basolateral amygdala of adult male rats, respectively. A rapid electrical kindling protocol was applied for kindling epileptogenesis. The stimulations were applied until rats showed three consecutive stage five seizures. Each rat was considered as its control. D-Lys-3-GHRP-6 (1, 12.5, and 25 μg/rat) or [D-Arg, D-phe, D-Trp, heu] substance P (D-SP) (50, 500 and 5000 ng/rat) as the GHSR antagonist or inverse agonist were injected into the basolateral amygdala. Seizure parameters including after-discharge duration (ADD), stage five duration (S5D), and seizure stage (SS) were documented thirty minutes following administration of the drugs or saline. Antagonism of the GHSR in the amygdala, significantly increased seizure induction in the kindled rats, in a dose-dependent manner, and induced spontaneous seizures leading to status epilepticus. Conversely, D-SP had a dose-dependent anticonvulsant activity, indicated by decreased ADD and S5D. The results show that GHSR inverse agonism suppressed seizure severity in the rat amygdala kindling model, whereas GHSR antagonism made seizures more severe. Therefore, when considering the ghrelin system to modulate seizures, it is crucial to note the differential impact of various GHSR ligands.
Study Information
pubmed
2023
2023-09-30T00:00:00.000Z
10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2023.107234
3
41