GHRP-6
Growth Hormone Releasing Peptide-6, Growth hormone-releasing hexapeptide, His-D-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2
The antagonism of ghrelin alters the appetitive response to learned cues associated with food.
Dailey. Megan J MJ; Moran. Timothy H TH; Holland. Peter C PC; Johnson. Alexander W AW
Key Findings
- A ghrelin receptor antagonist (D‑Lys3‑GHRP‑6) increased Pavlovian‑to‑instrumental transfer (PIT), meaning rats responded more to food‑associated cues.
- The same antagonist reduced the initiation of feeding in a cue‑potentiated feeding test, though overall sucrose intake stayed the same.
- Brain activity (FOS immunoreactivity) rose in PIT‑related regions after antagonist treatment, but not in regions linked to cue‑potentiated feeding.
Practical Outcomes
- The results hint that blocking ghrelin could alter how food cues drive behavior, potentially helping to curb cue‑induced overeating. However, the study was done in rats, used a specific antagonist, and did not show changes in total food consumption, so it’s not yet a ready‑to‑use protocol for humans. More research is needed before biohackers can safely apply ghrelin antagonism for appetite control.
Summary
In a rat study, blocking the ghrelin receptor with a compound called D‑Lys3‑GHRP‑6 changed how the animals reacted to food‑related cues. It made them press a lever more often when a food cue was present, but it slowed down the start of actual eating when the cue was shown, without changing the total amount of food they ate.
Abstract
The rapid increase in obesity may be partly mediated by an increase in the exposure to cues for food. Food-paired cues play a role in food procurement and intake under conditions of satiety. The mechanism by which this occurs requires characterization, but may involve ghrelin. This orexigenic peptide alters the response to food-paired conditioned stimuli, and neural responses to food images in reward nuclei. Therefore, we tested whether a ghrelin receptor antagonist alters the influence of food-paired cues on the performance of instrumental responses that earn food and the consumption of food itself using tests of Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) and cue potentiated feeding (CPF), respectively. Food-deprived rats received Pavlovian conditioning where an auditory cue was paired with delivery of sucrose solution followed by instrumental conditioning to lever press for sucrose. Following training, rats were given ad libitum access to chow. On test day, rats were injected with the ghrelin receptor antagonist GHRP-6 [D-Lys3] and then tested for PIT or CPF. Disrupting ghrelin signaling enhanced expression of PIT. In addition, GHRP-6 [D-Lys3] impaired the initiation of feeding behavior in CPF without influencing overall intake of sucrose. Finally, in PIT tested rats, enhanced FOS immunoreactivity was revealed following the antagonist in regions thought to underlie PIT; however, the antagonist had no effect on FOS immunoreactivity in CPF tested rats.
Study Information
pubmed
2016
2016-01-20T00:00:00.000Z
10.1016/j.bbr.2016.01.040
27
66