Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

GHRP-6

Growth Hormone Releasing Peptide-6, Growth hormone-releasing hexapeptide, His-D-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2

Quick Stats
Studies 702
Trials 0
Score 2
2015 pubmed 16 citations

Ghrelin signaling is not essential for sugar or fat conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Sclafani. Anthony A; Touzani. Khalid K; Ackroff. Karen K

Key Findings

  • Mice lacking the ghrelin receptor (GHSR‑null) still learned to prefer a flavor mixed with glucose over a non‑nutritive sweet flavor.
  • Giving wild‑type mice a ghrelin‑receptor blocker (D‑Lys3‑GHRP‑6) during training did not prevent them from developing the same glucose‑flavor preference.
  • Both oral and intragastric (post‑oral) delivery of glucose or fat created flavor preferences in mice regardless of ghrelin‑receptor status.

Practical Outcomes

  • For biohackers using GHRP‑6 or other ghrelin‑targeting compounds, this study suggests that tweaking ghrelin signaling is unlikely to change how you develop cravings or learned preferences for sweet or fatty foods. It doesn’t offer new dosing tips or performance benefits, but it warns that ghrelin‑based approaches may not be effective for appetite‑conditioning strategies.

Summary

In mice, neither removing the ghrelin receptor nor blocking it with a drug stopped the animals from learning to like flavors paired with sugar or fat. This means that the ghrelin system isn’t needed for the brain to form food‑related flavor preferences.

Abstract

The oral and post-oral actions of sugar and fat stimulate intake and condition flavor preferences in rodents through a process referred to as appetition. Ghrelin is implicated in food reward processing, and this study investigated its involvement in nutrient conditioning in mice. In Exp. 1 ghrelin receptor-null (GHSR-null) and C57BL/6 wildtype (WT) mice learned to prefer a flavor (CS+) mixed into 8% glucose over another flavor (CS-) mixed into a "sweeter" but non-nutritive 0.1% sucralose+saccharin (S+S) solution. In Exp. 2 treating WT mice with a ghrelin receptor antagonist [(D-Lys3)-GHRP-6] during flavor training did not prevent them from learning to prefer the CS+ glucose over the CS-S+S flavor. GHSR-null and WT mice were trained in Exp. 3 to drink a CS+ paired with intragastric (IG) infusion of 16% glucose and a CS- paired with IG water. Both groups drank more CS+ than CS- in training and preferred the CS+ to CS- in a choice test. The same (Exp. 4) and new (Exp. 5) GHSR-null and WT mice learned to prefer a CS+ flavor paired with IG fat (Intralipid) over a CS- flavor paired with IG water. GHSR-null and WT mice also learned to prefer a CS+ flavor added to 8% fructose over a CS- added to water. Together, these results indicate that ghrelin receptor signaling is not required for flavor preferences conditioned by the oral or post-oral actions of sugar and fat. This contrasts with other findings implicating ghrelin signaling in food reward processing and food-conditioned place preferences.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2015

Date

2015-05-21T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.05.016

Citations

16

References

63