GHRP-6
Growth Hormone Releasing Peptide-6, Growth hormone-releasing hexapeptide, His-D-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2
Inhibitory effects of ghrelin on sexual behavior: role of the peptide in the receptivity reduction induced by food restriction in mice.
Bertoldi. M L ML; Luque. E M EM; Carlini. V P VP; Vincenti. L M LM; Stutz. G G; Santillán. M E ME; Ruiz. R D RD; Fiol de Cuneo. M M; Martini. A C AC
Key Findings
- Ghrelin administration (both acute and chronic) significantly cuts female sexual receptivity in mice
- Food restriction, which raises natural ghrelin levels, also reduces receptivity
- Co‑administering a ghrelin antagonist (d‑Lys3‑GHRP‑6) reverses the drop in receptivity
Practical Outcomes
- If you’re a female using GHRP‑6 or other ghrelin‑stimulating methods, be aware it may lower libido or affect reproductive health, especially while dieting. Consider monitoring sexual function and, if needed, discuss ghrelin antagonists with a clinician. For men, the findings are less directly relevant, but they highlight a broader hormonal trade‑off between fasting‑induced growth hormone release and reproductive signaling.
Summary
The study shows that the hormone ghrelin, which rises when you fast, can lower sexual interest in female mice, and that a drug blocking ghrelin (d‑Lys3‑GHRP‑6) can stop this effect. This suggests that using ghrelin‑boosting peptides like GHRP‑6 might dampen libido or fertility in women, especially during calorie restriction, and that an antagonist could counteract it.
Abstract
Ghrelin (Ghr) is a gut/hypothalamus peptide with inhibitory actions on reproductive physiology; however, there are no previous reports of its role on estrous behavior. Under the hypothesis that the increase of plasma Ghr during food restriction (FR) is responsible for receptivity reduction, we intended to evaluate the receptivity percentage of female mice subjected to: exp. 1) acute and chronic FR and Ghr administration (3 nmol/animal/day, s. c.) and exp. 2) the co-administration of a ghrelin antagonist [ant=(d-Lys3)-GHRP-6; 6 nmol/animal/day s. c.]. All females were ovariectomized, primed with steroids, trained, and randomly subjected every week to each one of several protocols, followed by a behavioral test. Experiment 1 (n=8): basal, no treatment; acute FR (aFR), 24-h fasting; chronic FR (cFR), 50% FR for 5 days; acute ghrelin (aGhr), Ghr 30 min before test and chronic ghrelin (cGhr), Ghr for 5 days. Except for cGhr, all treatments significantly decreased the percentage of receptivity (mean±SEM): basal 61.9±6.0, aFR 33.1±8.1, cFR 18.8±7.7, aGhr 45.6±10.6, p<0.05 vs. basal. In exp. 2 (n=11), except for cFR+ant (55.0±6.4) the co-administration of the antagonist reversed the deleterious effects detected in exp. 1: basal 70.9±5.4; aFR+ant 72.3±7.6; aGhr+ant 73.6±4.7. As expected, the administration of vehicle or antagonist alone did not modify receptivity. Besides, we found a significant correlation between percentage of body weight loss and percentage of receptivity reduction (r=0.62, p=0.0004). This is the first study demonstrating that ghrelin is able to inhibit female mice sexual behavior and that is involved, at least in part, in receptivity reduction after food scarcity.
Study Information
pubmed
2011
2011-06-10T00:00:00.000Z
10.1055/s-0031-1277228
24
34