GHRP-6
Growth Hormone Releasing Peptide-6, Growth hormone-releasing hexapeptide, His-D-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2
Influence of body mass index and gender on growth hormone (GH) responses to GH-releasing hormone plus arginine and insulin tolerance tests.
Qu. Xiao-Dan XD; Gaw Gonzalo. Irene T IT; Al Sayed. Mohammed Y MY; Cohan. Pejman P; Christenson. Peter D PD; Swerdloff. Ronald S RS; Kelly. Daniel F DF; Wang. Christina C
Key Findings
- Peak GH response is higher after GHRH + arginine than after an insulin tolerance test.
- Higher BMI strongly predicts a lower GH response in both stimulation tests (r = –0.76 and –0.65).
- Apparent gender differences in GH response disappear after adjusting for BMI, suggesting BMI is the dominant factor.
Practical Outcomes
- For biohackers using GHRP‑6 or similar GH‑releasing peptides, expect stronger GH spikes if you are leaner; higher body fat can blunt the effect. Gender alone isn’t a reliable predictor of response once BMI is considered, so focus on body composition rather than sex when planning dosing or interpreting results.
Summary
In healthy adults, the amount of growth hormone released after a GHRH‑arginine test (similar to what GHRP‑6 does) drops as body‑mass index goes up, and women initially look like they have a bigger response, but that disappears once you account for BMI. The test also shows a bigger GH spike than the insulin tolerance test, regardless of age, gender, or BMI.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to assess whether gender and body mass index (BMI) should be considered in developing thresholds to define GH deficiency, using GH responses to GHRH + arginine (ARG) stimulation and insulin tolerance test (ITT). Thirty-nine healthy subjects (19 males, 20 females; ages 21-50 yr) underwent GHRH + ARG, and another 27 subjects (19 males, 8 females; ages 20-49 yr) underwent ITT. Peak GH response was significantly higher (P = 0.005) after GHRH + ARG than with ITT, and this difference could not be explained by age, gender, or BMI. Peak GH response was negatively correlated with BMI in both tests (GHRH + ARG, r = -0.76; and ITT, r = -0.65). Peak GH response to GHRH + ARG was higher in females than males (P = 0.004; ratio = 2.4), but it was attenuated after eliminating the influence of BMI (P = 0.13; ratio = 1.6). No significant gender differences were found in peak GH responses to ITT, which could be due to the smaller number of female subjects studied. GH response to GHRH + ARG and ITT stimulation is sensitive to BMI differences and less so to gender differences. A higher BMI is associated with a depressed GH response to both stimulation tests. BMI should therefore be considered as a factor when defining the diagnostic cut-off points in the assessment of GH deficiency, whereas whether gender should be likewise used is inconclusive from this study.
Study Information
pubmed
2004
2004-12-21T00:00:00.000Z
10.1210/jc.2004-1450