GHRP-6
Growth Hormone Releasing Peptide-6, Growth hormone-releasing hexapeptide, His-D-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2
Effects of repeated doses and continuous infusions of the growth hormone-releasing peptide hexarelin in conscious male rats.
Conley. L K LK; Gaillard. R C RC; Giustina. A A; Brogan. R S RS; Wehrenberg. W B WB
Key Findings
- Repeated bolus doses of hexarelin cause a diminishing GH response after the second injection, but the third dose recovers the response.
- Continuous infusion triggers an early GH spike that quickly returns to baseline, without altering the normal pulsatile GH pattern.
- A prolonged (174‑hour) continuous infusion is needed to see a significant increase in plasma IGF‑1.
Practical Outcomes
- For self‑experimenters, short‑term continuous infusion of a GHRP is unlikely to keep GH elevated, so intermittent bolus dosing may be more effective. However, the benefit of a multi‑day infusion is limited and may only modestly raise IGF‑1, which could be impractical for most users.
Summary
In rats, giving the growth hormone‑releasing peptide hexarelin as quick shots every two hours gave a strong GH surge the first time, a weaker response the second time, and then a response similar to the first shot on the third dose. When the peptide was pumped continuously, GH spiked early but then fell back to normal and the normal GH pulse pattern stayed the same. Only a very long (about 7‑day) continuous infusion raised IGF‑1 levels.
Abstract
We have previously shown that hexarelin, a novel GH-releasing peptide (GHRP), is able to elicit GH release when administered i.v., s.c. or by mouth and that it is a more potent GH secretagogue than GHRP-6. In the current study, we investigated the effects of hexarelin administered as repeated doses at 2 h intervals or as a continuous 6, 30 or 174 h infusion to conscious male rats. In the first experiment, adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were prepared with dual indwelling jugular catheters. On the day of experimentation, these animals received three 25 micrograms/kg i.v. boluses of hexarelin at 2 h intervals with blood sampling at 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after each dose. The mean peak GH response and the mean area under the GH response curve (AUC) for the 30 min after each administration were calculated and are reported as the mean +/- S.E.M. For both the peak and AUC results there was a significant (P < 0.05) difference in the GH response noted between the first (peak 301 +/- 37 ng/ml; AUC 5585 +/- 700 ng/ml per 30 min) and second (peak 149 +/- 47 ng/ml; AUC 3056 +/- 908 ng/ml per 30 min) injections of hexarelin, but not between the first and third (peak 214 +/- 49 ng/ml; AUC 3862 +/- 844 ng/ml per 30 min). In a second series of experiments, adult male Sprague-Dawley rats received continuous infusions (100 micrograms/h) of hexarelin or saline (1 ml/h) for 6, 30 or 174 h. Blood samples were collected every 20 min for the duration of the 6 h infusion and for the last 6 h of the two longer hexarelin infusions. Plasma GH concentrations peaked within 40 min of the initiation of infusion, but soon returned to basal levels. Mean plasma GH concentrations did not differ between any of the treatment groups, nor did any of the parameters of pulsatile hormone release analyzed. No significant differences in plasma corticosterone concentrations were noted between any of the treatment groups. On the other hand, while neither the 6 h (941 +/- 70 ng/ml) nor the 30 h (954 +/- 70 ng/ml) hexarelin infusions resulted in a significant increase in the plasma IGF-I concentrations over those noted in the saline controls (935 +/- 65 ng/ml), a 174 h hexarelin infusion did elicit a significant increase (1289 +/- 42 ng/ml; P < 0.05). Thus it appears that, while continuous exposure to hexarelin does not disrupt normal GH cycling, it may (after up to 174 h of exposure) alter other components of the growth axis. In addition, since the character of pulsatile GH release remained unaltered in response to the hexarelin infusion, it appears that this GHRP may not act by suppression of functional somatostatin tone as has been suggested previously.
Study Information
pubmed
1998
10.1677/joe.0.1580367