Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

GHRP-6

Growth Hormone Releasing Peptide-6, Growth hormone-releasing hexapeptide, His-D-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2

Quick Stats
Studies 702
Trials 0
Score 4
1996 pubmed

Growth hormone response to GHRH, GHRP-6 and GHRH + GHRP-6 in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.

Micić. D D; Kendereski. A A; Popović. V V; Sumarac. M M; Zorić. S S; Macut. D D; Dieguez. C C; Casanueva. F F

Key Findings

  • Obese PCOS women have a blunted GH response to GHRH alone
  • GHRP‑6 alone produces a normal GH peak in both lean and obese PCOS women
  • Combining GHRH with GHRP‑6 yields the highest GH peaks, especially in lean PCOS women

Practical Outcomes

  • For biohackers aiming to raise GH, especially if overweight or insulin‑resistant, adding GHRP‑6 (≈90‑100 ”g subcutaneously) can restore the GH response that GHRH alone may miss. Using GHRP‑6 together with a GHRH analog (e.g., sermorelin) can further amplify GH spikes, offering a more potent protocol for growth‑hormone‑related benefits.

Summary

The study shows that in women with PCOS who are obese, their growth hormone (GH) response to the usual GH‑releasing hormone (GHRH) is weak, but giving the peptide GHRP‑6 restores the GH surge, and combining GHRP‑6 with GHRH gives an even bigger boost. This means GHRP‑6 can overcome obesity‑related GH resistance and works well together with GHRH.

Abstract

Despite improved diagnostic facilities and advanced in vitro studies, the primary causes of the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) have not been resolved. A defect in the regulation of GH secretion has been suggested in PCOS but the available data are limited and the underlying mechanisms remain unknown. In recent years considerable attention has been devoted to non-classic GH secretagogues and, in particular, to the series of hexapeptides of which GH-releasing peptide (His-D-Trp-Ala-Trp-D-Phe-Lys-NH2, known as GHRP-6) is the most representative. GHRP-6 seems to be a promising tool for exploring GH secretory mechanisms and it has been reported that GHRH + GHRP-6 is a powerful stimulus to GH secretion. Our aim was to investigate the GH responses to GHRH, GHRP-6 and the administration of GHRP + GHRP-6 in two groups of patients (normal weight and obese) with PCOS in comparison with matched control groups. All subjects were studied three times on different days with GHRH (100 micrograms i.v.), GHRP-6 (90 micrograms i.v.) and GHRH + GHRP-6 (100 micrograms + 90 micrograms). Sixteen women with PCOS and 22 healthy controls were studied. They were divided into four groups according to BMI: Group A (non-obese PCOS, n = 6, age 21.8 +/- 1.7 years, BMI 22.1 +/- 0.8 kg/m2); Group B: (obese PCOS, n = 10, age 21.7 +/- 1.3 years, BMI 32.9 +/- 2.1 kg/m2); Group C (non-obese healthy women, n = 13, age 26.8 +/- 1.5 years, BMI 21.8 +/- 0.6 kg/m2) and Group D (obese healthy women, n = 9, age 29.4 +/- 4.2 years, BMI 35.7 +/- 1.3 kg/m2). Serum GH was measured using a time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay (Delphia, Pharmacia). After GHRH administration significant differences were found between GH peaks in Groups A and B (82.4 +/- 16.4 vs 20 +/- 4.9 mU/l, P < 0.05) and in AUC for GH between Groups A and B (4667 +/- 1061 vs 947 +/- 236, P < 0.05) while there were no differences between the same groups in GH peak or AUC after GHRP-6 administration. There were no significant differences in peaks or AUC for GH after GHRH between Groups A and C, nor between Groups B and D. There were significant differences in GH peaks after combined administration of GHRH + GHRP-6 between Groups A and B (211 +/- 26.4 vs 108 +/- 17.6, P < 0.05) as well as between GH AUC in Groups A and B (12068 +/- 2323 vs 5997 +/- 1342, P < 0.05). There were no differences in GH peaks or AUC for GH after GHRH + GHRP-6 administration between Groups A and C or Groups B and D. The impaired GH response to GHRH found in obese PCOS patients is a consequence of obesity and could be a functional defect, since it can be overridden with GHRP-6 administration.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

1996

DOI

10.1046/j.1365-2265.1996.8380848.x