Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Gonadorelin

GnRH, Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone, LHRH, Factrel

Quick Stats
Studies 192
Trials 100
2025 pubmed

Understanding the role of statin use on advanced prostate cancer outcomes: Does the statin type, cumulative dose, or duration impact survival?

León. Alexa Rose AR; Risk. Michael M; Ricke. William A WA; Liou. Jinn-Ing JI; Jarrard. David F DF; Richards. Kyle A KA

Key Findings

  • Men on statins for 36 months or more had a 40% lower risk of death overall compared to shorter use.
  • Higher cumulative statin doses were modestly associated with improved survival.
  • Hydrophilic (water‑soluble) statins showed a stronger survival benefit than other types, but statin type did not affect cancer‑specific survival.

Practical Outcomes

  • For biohackers interested in gonadorelin, this paper offers no actionable information. It suggests that, in prostate cancer patients on hormone therapy, long‑term, higher‑dose statin use may improve outcomes, but it does not translate to any peptide‑based protocol or general longevity advice.

Summary

This study looked at men with advanced prostate cancer who were on hormone therapy and also took statin drugs. It found that longer use (at least three years) and higher doses of statins were linked to better overall and cancer‑specific survival, especially for water‑soluble statins. However, the research does not involve gonadorelin or provide any guidance on using peptides for health optimization.

Abstract

To further investigate the association of improved survival in men with prostate cancer (PCa) on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), we hypothesized that increased duration and dose of statin in men with PCa on ADT would show a greater effect. Using Veterans Affairs databases, we identified all men diagnosed with PCa between 2000 and 2008 that were treated with ADT with follow-up through May 2016. Exclusions included treatment with ADT or statins for ≤6 months or ADT receipt concurrently with localized radiation. Patients were stratified by cumulative duration of statin use <36 or ≥36 months, and we adjusted for cumulative dose and statin type. Cox proportional hazards ratios were calculated for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) after propensity score adjustment. The cohort after exclusions consisted of 52,763 patients: 32% had a cumulative duration use of statins <36 months. Our analysis for OS showed improved survival in the ≥36 months group (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.57-0.63), the highest cumulative dose group (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.99), and hydrophilic group (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.54-0.62). In our competing risks analysis for CSS, we noted improved survival in the ≥36 months group (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.95) and the highest cumulative dose group (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.93), but statin type was not associated with improved survival (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.66-1.01). We show a strong minimum effective dose/duration type relationship with statin use in Veterans with PCa receiving ADT.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2025

Date

2025-11-20T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.11.004

References

30