Immunogenicity of recombinant gonadotropin-releasing hormone contraceptive vaccines in male pigs.
Bondavalli. Jean Vitor JV; Quirino. Monike Willemin MW; Conrad. Neida N; Peripolli. Vanessa V; Schwegler. Elizabeth E; Silveira. Matheus Folgearini MF; Tutida. Yuso Y; Gasperin. Bernardo Garziera BG; Leite. Fábio Pereira Leivas FPL; Bianchi. Ivan I; Moreira. Fabiana F
Key Findings
- Both recombinant GnRH/LTB vaccines produced high anti‑GnRH antibody levels comparable to or higher than the commercial vaccine.
- Testosterone levels and testicular size remained higher in the experimental vaccine groups than in the commercial vaccine group.
- Testicular damage was milder with the experimental vaccines, especially the lower‑dose (300 µg) formulation.
Practical Outcomes
- For DIY hormone or fertility experiments, this study suggests that simply raising anti‑GnRH antibodies with a recombinant vaccine may not be enough to suppress testosterone or achieve strong contraceptive effects. The commercial vaccine performed better, but it also caused more severe testicular damage. More research is needed before considering such vaccines for human use or self‑experimentation.
Summary
Researchers tested two experimental GnRH vaccines in male piglets and compared them to a commercial vaccine and surgical castration. Both new vaccines generated strong antibody responses, but they didn't lower testosterone or shrink testicles as much as the commercial product, meaning they were less effective at acting as a contraceptive in this animal model.
Abstract
This study assessed the contraceptive effects of two vaccines formulated with recombinant gonadotropin-releasing hormone antigen (rGnRH antigen) conjugated with the heat-labile enterotoxin B subunit (LTB) protein from Escherichia coli in male pigs. Thirty-two piglets were assigned to four groups: Surg, surgically castrated at 3 days old; Vvx, non-castrated and vaccinated with a commercial vaccine (Vivax®) at 101 and 135 days old; rGnRH-400 and rGnRH-300, non-castrated and vaccinated at 101 and 135 days old with recombinant vaccines containing 400 µg or 300 µg rGnRH/LTB per dose, respectively. Growth performance was not affected by treatment (p ≥ 0.25). At 155 and 165 days old, piglets in the rGnRH-400 and rGnRH-300 groups exhibited anti-GnRH/LTB antibody levels were similar to those in the Vvx group (p > 0.05) or higher (p < 0.05) than those in the Vvx group. However, rGnRH-400 and rGnRH-300 piglets showed higher testosterone concentrations at 155 and 165 days old and greater testicular volumes at 165 days old than Vvx piglets (p < 0.05). Severe testicular lesions (scores 3 and 4) were more frequent in the Vvx group, while those in the rGnRH-400 group were mainly scored as 3, and only mild lesions (scores 1 and 2) were observed in the rGnRH-300 group. Overall, both recombinant vaccines elicited strong anti-GnRH/LTB antibody levels; however, they did not produce the same degree of testicular alterations or testosterone reduction as the commercial vaccine. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the contraceptive potential of these recombinant formulations, particularly the 400 µg rGnRH/LTB vaccine.
Study Information
pubmed
2025
2025-11-01T00:00:00.000Z
10.1016/j.domaniend.2025.106979
44