Impact of GnRH Agonist Pretreatment on Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Outcomes of Overweight/Obese Women Undergoing Hormone Replacement Therapy.
Huang. Zhihui Z; Liao. Yajie Y; Xie. Qiqi Q; Deng. Yanqing Y; Chen. Hong H; Wan. Xinxia X; Tian. Lifeng L; Xia. Leizhen L; Zhao. Yan Y; Huang. Jialyu J
Key Findings
- GnRH‑agonist pretreatment plus HRT gave a higher live‑birth rate than HRT alone (55.8% vs 49.3%).
- Positive hCG, clinical pregnancy, and implantation rates were also higher with GnRH‑agonist pretreatment.
- The benefit was strongest in women with dyslipidemia (adjusted OR ≈ 1.75) and not significant in those with normal lipids.
- Miscarriage rates did not differ between the two groups.
Practical Outcomes
- For overweight/obese women undergoing frozen‑thawed embryo transfer, adding a depot GnRH‑agonist before hormone replacement may improve pregnancy outcomes, particularly if they have high cholesterol or triglycerides. This protocol can be considered as a tailored endometrial‑preparation step, but larger randomized trials are still needed to confirm the findings.
Summary
A study of nearly 2,000 frozen‑embryo transfers found that giving overweight or obese women a depot GnRH‑agonist (gonadorelin) before the usual hormone‑replacement prep raised their chances of a live birth from about 49% to 56%, especially if they also have abnormal blood lipids.
Abstract
Overweight and obesity are link to impaired endometrial receptivity and decreased pregnancy success in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. Depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) pretreatment before hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has been shown to improve endometrial function through multiple mechanisms. However, its efficacy in overweight and obese women remains unknown. This retrospective cohort study analyzed 1968 FET cycles from a large fertility center in Jiangxi Province between January 2016 and December 2021. Overweight and obese women were defined as those with body mass index ≥24.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> according to the Chinese criteria and categorized into HRT (n=946) and GnRH-a+HRT (n=1022) groups. The primary outcome measure was the live birth rate. Potential confounders were controlled by 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable logistic regression. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the status of dyslipidemia. After PSM, 539 women remained in each group with balanced baseline characteristics. The GnRH-a+HRT group demonstrated a significantly higher live birth rate compared to the HRT group (55.84% vs 49.35%, P=0.033). Similarly, women with GnRH-a pretreatment had higher rates of positive hCG test (77.18% vs 68.65%, P=0.002), clinical pregnancy (68.09% vs 60.48%, P=0.009), and implantation (52.41% vs 47.47%, P=0.039), whereas the miscarriage rate was no statistical difference between groups (17.71% vs 16.87%, P=0.771). In the dyslipidemia subgroup, the increased likelihood of live birth remained for the GnRH-a+HRT protocol (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-2.85), but was not evident in the normolipidemia subgroup (aOR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.87-1.58). In summary, our study provides novel clinical evidence suggesting that GnRH-a pretreatment improves FET pregnancy outcomes in overweight and obese women compared to HRT alone, especially among those with dyslipidemia. The findings support a tailored approach for endometrial preparation in this population; however, further multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed for confirmation.
Study Information
pubmed
2025
2025-10-13T00:00:00.000Z
10.2147/dddt.s551326