Effects in vitro of new growth hormone releasing peptide (GHRP-1) on growth hormone secretion from ovine pituitary cells in primary culture.
Wu. D D; Chen. C C; Zhang. J J; Katoh. K K; Clarke. I I
Key Findings
- GHRPâ1 (KPâ101) stimulates GH release from ovine pituitary cells in a doseâdependent way, with a halfâmaximal effective concentration of about 10â»â·âŻM.
- Its maximal GHâreleasing effect is lower than that of GRF, though similar to GHRPâ6.
- Blocking calcium channels stops the GHâreleasing action of all three peptides, showing calcium dependence.
- Repeated dosing reduces the response, but switching between peptides does not cause additional desensitization; only a small additive effect is seen when combined at maximal doses.
Practical Outcomes
- For biohackers, this study only confirms that GHRPâ1 can trigger GH release in a cell model, but it offers no human dosing guidance, safety data, or clear advantage over existing peptides. Until human studies are done, itâs not a basis for changing any GHâboosting protocols.
Summary
In a lab test using sheep pituitary cells, the new peptide GHRPâ1 (also called KPâ101) was shown to make the cells release growth hormone, but it needed a higher concentration to work and never reached the maximum effect that the classic hormoneâreleasing factor (GRF) could achieve. The effect depended on calcium channels, and the peptide behaved similarly to the older GHRPâ6. These results come from an inâvitro experiment, not from human trials.
Abstract
Continuous perifusion of pituitary cells was used to study the effects of a newly synthesized GHRP (GHRP-1 or KP 101) on growth hormone (GH) secretion from ovine pituitary cells and these have been compared to effects of growth hormone-releasing factor (GRF) and the original growth hormone-releasing peptide (GHRP-6). GH was continuously released at a constant rate during perifusion and secretion was increased by KP 101, GHRP-6 and GRF in a dose-dependent manner. The half-maximal effective dose of KP 101 and GHRP-6 was 10(-7) M, an order of magnitude higher than that for GRF. The maximal effects of KP 101 and GHRP-6 were similar but significantly less than the maximal effect of GRF. Blockade of calcium channels with Cd2+ (2 mM) totally and reversibly abolished the releasing effects of all three peptides. Like GHRP-6, the GH release induced by KP 101 was not affected by a GRF antagonist ([Ac-Tyr1, D-Arg2]-GRF 1-29, 1 microM) which significantly reduced the effect of GRF on GH release. For each peptide, the response to a second application (1 h after the first application) was lower than the first response. When GRF (or KP 101, GHRP-6) was applied first and then KP 101 or GHRP-6 (or GRF) given 1 h later, the second response was not attenuated. Only a small additive effect on the release of GH by GRF was obtained by the co-administration of either KP 101 or GHRP-6. This result was achieved with maximal doses of the peptides, but not with half-maximal doses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Study Information
pubmed
1994
1994-04-01T00:00:00.000Z
10.1111/j.1365-2826.1994.tb00571.x
41
30