Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Mod GRF 1-29

Sermorelin, Growth Hormone Releasing Hormone (1-29), hGRF(1-29)NH2

Quick Stats
Studies 227
Trials 47
1999 pubmed

Predicting bull growth performance and carcass composition from growth hormone response to growth hormone-releasing hormone.

Connor. E E EE; Barao. S M SM; Douglass. L W LW; Zinn. S A SA; Dahl. G E GE

Key Findings

  • A higher area‑under‑the‑curve (AUC) for GH after a GRF‑1‑29 dose correlated with greater average daily gain in bulls.
  • Higher GH response was associated with lower carcass fat content.
  • GH response to GRF‑1‑29 was a better predictor of future growth than traditional weaning weight metrics.

Practical Outcomes

  • For beef producers, measuring GH response to a GRF‑1‑29 injection could help select superior sire lines. For the biohacker community, the study offers no actionable protocol or health benefit for humans, as the results are limited to cattle growth performance.

Summary

The study tested whether a single injection of a growth‑hormone‑releasing hormone (GRF‑1‑29) can predict how fast young bulls will grow and how much meat versus fat they will have later. They measured the bulls' growth‑hormone spikes after the injection and found that larger hormone spikes were linked to faster growth and leaner carcasses. The findings are specific to cattle breeding and do not provide direct guidance for human health or performance.

Abstract

Development of practical, physiologically based methods that provide an early, yet accurate, evaluation of a bull's genetic merit could benefit the beef industry. The use of GH response to a single, acute dose of GHRH was evaluated as a predictor of future growth performance and carcass characteristics of weanling bulls. Fifty-six Angus bulls averaging 229 d (SD = 27) of age were administered three doses i.v. (0, 1.5, and 4.5 microg/100 kg BW) of human GHRH (1-29) analog in a Latin square design balanced for residual effects. Blood samples were collected via jugular catheter at -60, -45, -30, -15, 0, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min relative to GHRH injection. Serum concentrations of GH were plotted over time. Response to GHRH was calculated as the area under the GH response curve (AUC-GH) using the trapezoidal approximation. Relationships between AUC-GH, weaning weight adjusted to 205 d of age (205-d WW), and direct weaning weight EPD (WWEPD) versus age-adjusted BW (BWadj), ADG, and carcass measurements from a 140-d growth performance test were evaluated using simple linear regression. A positive correlation between AUC-GH and ADG and an inverse relationship between AUC-GH and carcass fat were observed. The present study provides evidence that AUC-GH is a better predictor of future growth performance in beef bulls than 205-d WW or WWEPD values. Thus, GH response to GHRH is associated with subsequent growth and may be a useful tool for sire selection in beef production.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

1999

DOI

10.2527/1999.77102736x