Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Mod GRF 1-29

Sermorelin, Growth Hormone Releasing Hormone (1-29), hGRF(1-29)NH2

Quick Stats
Studies 227
Trials 47
Score 1
1991 pubmed

Lack of effect of vasoactive intestinal peptide antagonists on blood flow in the rat thyroid.

Michalkiewicz. M M; Huffman. L J LJ; Hedge. G A GA

Key Findings

  • The three VIP antagonists tested did not reduce thyroid blood flow or hormone secretion in rats.
  • Even high doses of the antagonists failed to block the blood‑flow‑increasing effect of VIP.
  • The antagonists also did not affect VIP‑induced blood flow changes in the pancreas or salivary glands.

Practical Outcomes

  • For biohackers looking to modulate thyroid blood flow or hormone levels with these VIP blockers, the study shows they are ineffective. There’s no actionable protocol or dosage to recommend from these compounds for thyroid or metabolic benefits.

Summary

Scientists tested three chemicals that were supposed to block a hormone called VIP, to see if they could change blood flow in the thyroid gland of rats. The drugs didn't affect thyroid blood flow or hormone release, even at much higher doses than the hormone itself. This means those particular blockers don't work for influencing thyroid blood flow.

Abstract

We used three putative vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) antagonists: 1) [4C1-D-Phe6,Leu17]VIP, 2) [N-Ac-Tyr1,D-Phe2] GRF(1-29)-NH2, and 3) VIP(10-28) to assess the involvement of endogenous VIP in the regulation of thyroid hormone secretion and thyroid blood flow (BF). We measured thyroid BF in ketamine-pentobarbital-anesthetized rats using the microsphere technique. Increases in thyroid BF induced by VIP administration (30 pmol-1.5 nmol/100 g b.wt.) were not affected by any of the three compounds tested at doses 10-100 times higher than that of VIP. These compounds (3-15 nmol/100 g b.wt.) also failed to affect basal thyroid BF or hormone secretion. Increases in pancreatic and salivary gland BFs induced by VIP (30 pmol/100 g b.wt.) were also not affected by [4C1-D-Phe6,Leu17]VIP or [N-Ac-Tyr1,D-Phe2]GRF(1-29)-NH2 (3 nmol/100 g b.wt.). These results indicate that the three compounds tested are not effective inhibitors of VIP receptors in the thyroid vasculature and, therefore, they cannot be used in the investigation of the functional significance of endogenous VIP in the regulation of thyroid BF.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

1991

DOI

10.1016/0196-9781(91)90192-r