Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Mod GRF 1-29

Sermorelin, Growth Hormone Releasing Hormone (1-29), hGRF(1-29)NH2

Quick Stats
Studies 227
Trials 47
Score 3
1986 pubmed 26 citations

Does growth hormone releasing factor desensitize the somatotroph? Interpretation of responses of growth hormone during and after 10-hour infusion of GRF 1-29 amide in man.

Davis. J R JR; Sheppard. M C MC; Shakespear. R A RA; Lynch. S S SS; Clayton. R N RN

Key Findings

  • Continuous 10‑hour infusion of GRF‑1‑29 caused ongoing GH pulses without a drop in total hormone released during the infusion.
  • After the infusion, a bolus dose of GRF‑1‑29 produced a reduced and variable GH spike, suggesting possible desensitization of the somatotroph cells.
  • The study involved only four adult males, so individual responses varied.

Practical Outcomes

  • For biohackers, using GRF‑1‑29 as a continuous infusion may blunt the hormone’s acute effect, so intermittent or pulsed dosing could preserve responsiveness. Short‑term, low‑frequency dosing might be more effective for boosting GH spikes than long, steady infusions.

Summary

A short study gave four healthy men a steady 10‑hour infusion of the growth‑hormone‑releasing peptide GRF‑1‑29. GH levels rose in pulses during the infusion, but after the infusion the same dose given as a quick shot produced a weaker and inconsistent GH response, hinting that the pituitary may become less responsive after continuous exposure.

Abstract

It is unclear whether growth hormone releasing factor (GRF) administration in vivo may desensitize the somatotroph. To investigate this possibility we have examined the effects of 10-h infusion of the equipotent 1-29 amide analogue of hpGRF on serum GH levels and on the subsequent GH response to a bolus dose of GRF (1-29). Four normal adult males received an intravenous infusion of 1-29 GRF (1 microgram/kg/h) from 0800 to 1800 h, with blood samples taken at 10 min intervals. A 100 micrograms intravenous bolus dose of GRF was given at 1800 h, and sampling continued for a further 90 min. GH levels were near or below the limit of detection (0.5 mU/l) throughout the control 10 h period. During GRF infusion there was increased GH release with pulses of irregular frequency and amplitude (up to 80 mU/l) continuing throughout the entire infusion period. There was no apparent reduction in total GH released towards the latter part of the infusion. On the control day, 100 micrograms GRF bolus increased mean (+/- SEM) GH from 0.82 +/- 0.21 mU/l to a peak of 59.0 +/- 44.8 mU/l (P less than 0.002). Following 10-GRF infusion, responses to bolus injection of GRF were reduced, but variable. In two subjects a small rise in GH levels occurred (basal 6.4 and 7.2 rising to peak values of 11.2 and 23.0 mU/l respectively). In the other two subjects, GH levels fell but in these the GRF bolus had coincided with a GH peak. The loss of GRF responsiveness after GRF infusion may be due to 'desensitization'.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

1986

Date

1986-02-01T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1111/j.1365-2265.1986.tb00755.x

Citations

26

References

7