Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Mod GRF 1-29

Sermorelin, Growth Hormone Releasing Hormone (1-29), hGRF(1-29)NH2

Quick Stats
Studies 227
Trials 47
Score 2
1987 pubmed

Mechanisms of calcitonin-induced growth hormone (GH) suppression: roles of somatostatin and GH-releasing factor.

Lengyel. A M AM; Tannenbaum. G S GS

Key Findings

  • Central (brain) injection of salmon calcitonin dramatically reduces the size of spontaneous GH pulses in rats.
  • The GH suppression does not involve increased release of somatostatin from the hypothalamus.
  • Calcitonin makes the pituitary somatotroph cells less responsive to administered GRF‑1‑29, independent of blood calcium changes.

Practical Outcomes

  • For biohackers aiming to boost GH for muscle growth or recovery, using calcitonin (or drugs that raise its brain levels) could counteract those goals by dampening GH pulses. The findings suggest avoiding calcitonin if you want maximal GH release, and they highlight that simply adding more GRF may not overcome calcitonin‑induced GH suppression.

Summary

The study shows that giving calcitonin directly into the brain of rats sharply cuts down the natural pulses of growth hormone (GH). This suppression isn’t because more somatostatin (a hormone that blocks GH) is released, and it also makes the pituitary less responsive to GH‑releasing factor (GRF). In short, calcitonin can blunt GH spikes via a central brain mechanism.

Abstract

Calcitonin (CT) binds to specific receptors in the hypothalamus and has been localized in the pituitary, suggesting a potential neuroendocrine role for this peptide. We and others have previously shown that CT given centrally markedly suppresses pulsatile GH secretion. However, the mechanism mediating this response remains to be elucidated. In the present study, we assessed the involvement of the two hypothalamic GH-regulatory peptides, somatostatin (SRIF) and GH-releasing factor (GRF), using a combination of in vivo and in vitro techniques. Six-hour GH secretory profiles were obtained from eight groups of freely moving rats bearing chronic intracerebroventricular (icv) and intraatrial cannulae. In four groups, salmon (s) CT (250 ng/10 microliters) was administered icv, whereas the remaining four groups received either normal saline (NS) icv or sCT iv. Central injection of sCT caused a severe suppression in amplitude of spontaneous GH pulses compared to NS icv-treated control rats, whereas the same dose of sCT iv had no significant effect. Passive immunization of sCT icv-injected rats with a specific antiserum to SRIF failed to restore the amplitude of GH pulses to normal values. In addition, in vitro basal and 50 mM K+-stimulated SRIF release from incubated hypothalamic fragments was not altered by sCT in doses ranging from 10(-10) to 10(-6) M. The iv administration of a bolus of rat GRF (1-29)NH2 (1 microgram) 1 h after sCT icv injection also failed to augment plasma GH levels compared to sCT iv-treated rats (16.6 +/- 10.0 vs. 326.6 +/- 63.6 ng/ml; P less than 0.001) and NS icv controls (407.2 +/- 145.4 ng/ml; P less than 0.01). Blood calcium levels decreased similarly 1 h after iv and icv sCT administration. These results demonstrate that: sCT inhibits pulsatile GH secretion via a central nervous system site of action, GH suppression induced by sCT is apparently not due solely to increased hypothalamic SRIF release, and centrally administered sCT produces an acute loss of responsiveness of somatotrophs to GRF, which can be dissociated from peripheral blood calcium levels.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

1987

DOI

10.1210/endo-120-4-1377