Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Hexarelin

Examorelin, HEX

Quick Stats
Studies 233
Trials 61
Score 3
1999 pubmed

Hexarelin-induced growth hormone response in short stature. Comparison with growth hormone-releasing hormone plus pyridostigmine and arginine plus estrogen.

Guzzaloni. G G; Grugni. G G; Morabito. F F

Key Findings

  • A 2 µg/kg IV dose of hexarelin produced the highest GH peak (Cmax) and overall exposure (AUC) among the doses tested.
  • Hexarelin’s diagnostic specificity (62‑75%) was comparable to GHRH + pyridostigmine and arginine + ethinylestradiol, offering no clear advantage.
  • Combining GHRH + pyridostigmine with arginine + ethinylestradiol gave reliable GH responses at lower cost, making it a preferred first‑line test.

Practical Outcomes

  • If you want a strong GH spike, use hexarelin at 2 µg/kg IV, but expect similar results to cheaper secretagogue combos. Because IV administration is cumbersome and specificity isn’t higher, most DIY protocols may favor GHRH + pyridostigmine or arginine + low‑dose estrogen for GH testing or boosting.

Summary

Hexarelin, a synthetic six‑amino‑acid peptide, can trigger a big growth‑hormone (GH) surge when given at 2 µg per kg of body weight by IV. However, its ability to correctly identify GH‑deficient people isn’t better than cheaper tests that combine a GH‑releasing hormone (GHRH) with pyridostigmine or arginine with low‑dose estrogen. For DIYers, the higher dose works best, but the IV route and lack of extra specificity make it less attractive than the cheaper oral/IV combos.

Abstract

Hexarelin (HEX) is a synthetic hexapeptide with strong GH-stimulating activity. We evaluated GH response (expressed as maximum value after stimulus [Cmax] and as area under the curve [AUC]) to HEX at the doses of 1 microg/kg i.v. (HEX 1) and 2 microg/kg i.v. (HEX 2), in comparison with the responses to GHRH (1 microg/kg i.v.) + pyridostigmine (PD, 60 mg po) and to arginine (ARG, 0.5 mg/kg i.v.) + ethinylestradiol (EE, 1 mg/day po for 3 days before the stimulation), in 5 subjects with familial short stature (FSS), 11 with constitutional growth delay (CGD), 6 with GH neurosecretory dysfunction (NSD), and 5 with isolated growth hormone deficiency (GHD). Cmax and AUC after HEX 1 were 26.8+/-10.5 ng/ml and 1448+/-514 ng/min x ml in FSS, 23.6+/-14.4 ng/ml and 1146+/-750 ng/min x ml in CGD, 36.9+/-21.5 ng/ml and 2048+/-1288 ng/min x ml in NSD, 9.4+/-5.8 ng/ml and 498+/-200 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax and AUC in FSS and CGD, p<0.05 vs GHD). Cmax and AUC after HEX 2 were 37.7+/-16 ng/ml and 1979+/-888 ng/min x ml in FSS, 32.5+/-16.2 ng/ml and 1613+/-237 ng/min x ml in CGD, 39.7+/-20.7 ng/ml and 2366+/-1569 ng/min xml in NSD, 13.4+/-4.2 ng/ml and 645+/-293 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax in FSS, CGD and NSD p<0.01 vs GHD; AUC in NSD, p<05 vs GHD). Cmax and AUC after GHRH+/-PD were 46.6+/-8.8 ng/ml and 3294+/-1031 ng/min x ml in FSS, 25.9+/-11.2 ng/ml and 1464+/-735 ng/min x ml in CGD, 38.8+/-21.7 ng/ml and 2428+/-1399 ng/min x ml in NSD, 8.4+/-6.2 ng/ml and 685+/-572 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax and AUC in FSS, p<0.001 vs CGD and GHD; Cmax in CGD and NSD, p<0.001 vs GHD). Cmax and AUC after ARG+EE were 21.3+/-4.2 ng/ml and 1432+/-514 ng/min x ml in FSS, 14.8+/-10 ng/ml and 805+/-489 ng/min x ml in CGD, 22.2+/-12.8 ng/ml and 1199+/-309 ng/min x ml in NSD, 4.6+/-2.5 ng/ml and 247+/-191 ng/min x ml in GHD (Cmax and AUC in FSS, CGD and NSD, p<0.01 vs GHD). Specificity was 62% for HEX 1 and 75% for HEX 2, GHRH+PD and ARG+EE. From a diagnostic point of view, HEX 1 + HEX 2 was the association with the largest percentage of false positives (20% in FSS, 27% in CGD and 33% in NSD), HEX 1 +GHRH+PD resulted in 9% in CGD, while the combined use of HEX 1 or HEX 2 with GHRH+PD or ARG+EE and of GHRH+PD with ARG+EE did not show false positive responses. I) the most effective dose of HEX was 2 microg/kg i.v.; 2) HEX did not show more specificity than GHRH+PD and ARG+EE; 3) the association of GHRH+PD with ARG+EE could yield the best results at lower costs, confirming these tests as first-line tools in evaluating GH secretion.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

1999

DOI

10.1007/bf03343574