Age-related differences in growth hormone (GH) regulation during strenuous exercise.
de Vries. W R WR; Lambers. M M; van Zanten. D P DP; Osman-Dualeh. M M; Maitimu. I I; Koppeschaar. H P HP
Key Findings
- Younger men have a robust GH increase after strenuous exercise, after GHRH, and after hexarelin.
- Older men show almost no GH response to exercise or GHRH, but retain a strong GH response to hexarelin.
- The authors propose that exercise‑induced GH release in young men relies on suppressing somatostatin and activating a hexarelin‑related central pathway, which is impaired with age.
Practical Outcomes
- For biohackers, hexarelin may be a useful tool to boost GH in older adults when exercise alone is insufficient. However, the peptide is still experimental, and safety data are limited, so caution and further research are needed before incorporating it into regular protocols.
Summary
The study shows that younger men get a big growth‑hormone (GH) boost from intense exercise, while older men do not. However, both age groups still respond strongly to the peptide hexarelin, which can raise GH even when exercise or a standard hormone‑releasing factor (GHRH) fails in older people. The authors think this is because older adults have more somatostatin (a GH‑blocking hormone) activity that blocks the normal exercise‑GH pathway, but hexarelin works through a different route.
Abstract
This study was designed to investigate the central neuroendocrine mechanisms by which exercise (EX) stimulates growth hormone (GH) release as a function of age. Twelve male subjects, six in their early-to-mid twenties and six in their late sixties or seventies, received a strong GH stimulus either as incremental EX until volitional exhaustion or by administration of GHRH alone or Hex alone two hours after a presumed maximal GH response to combined administration of GHRH plus hexarelin (Hex). Total GH availability was calculated as area under the curve (AUC) over time periods 0 - 120 and 120 - 240 min. The mean AUC in micro g/l x 120 min to GHRH+Hex in the younger group was approximately twice that in the older group (11,260, range 3,947 - 19,007 vs. 5,366, range 2,262 - 8,654). In younger males, the mean AUC to EX (509, range 0 - 1,151) was larger than to GHRH (119, range 0 - 543), but less than that to Hex (919, range 0 - 1,892). In the older group, GH responses to EX and GHRH were abolished (mean AUC: 112, range 0 - 285, and 156, range 30 - 493), respectively) in contrast to the response to Hex (1,077, range 189 - 1,780). These data indicate that maximal GH stimulation by GHRH+Hex results in greater desensitization of GHRH compared to Hex, irrespective of age. We postulate that the abolished responsiveness of GH to EX in older group is due to insufficient disinhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin activity and desensitization of GHRH, while the preserved activity of a central Hex-related pathway is not involved. The GH response to EX in younger males is due to complete inhibition of somatostatin activity and stimulation of a central Hex-related pathway in spite of GHRH desensitization. We conclude that a central Hex-related pathway is the primary factor for EX-induced GH release only in younger males.
Study Information
pubmed
2004
2004-07-01T00:00:00.000Z
10.1055/s-2004-825722
32