Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Hexarelin

Examorelin, HEX

Quick Stats
Studies 233
Trials 61
Score 2
1998 pubmed

The growth hormone response to hexarelin in patients with different hypothalamic-pituitary abnormalities.

Maghnie. M M; Spica-Russotto. V V; Cappa. M M; Autelli. M M; Tinelli. C C; Civolani. P P; Deghenghi. R R; Severi. F F; Loche. S S

Key Findings

  • Hexarelin (2 µg/kg IV) raises GH more than GHRH in healthy short children
  • Patients with a residual pituitary stalk (group 1) responded to hexarelin, though less than normals
  • Patients lacking the stalk (group 2) showed minimal GH response to hexarelin

Practical Outcomes

  • For self‑experimenters, hexarelin may only be useful if your hypothalamic‑pituitary axis is intact; it won’t overcome a broken pituitary connection. The IV dose used in the study isn’t practical for most users, and there’s no evidence it works the same way in healthy adults. Consider focusing on other GH‑boosting methods unless you have a specific medical reason and clinical supervision.

Summary

Hexarelin can boost growth hormone (GH) when given by IV, but its effect depends on having an intact pituitary stalk. In kids with a partially missing stalk, it raised GH almost as well as a standard GH‑releasing hormone, while those with a completely absent stalk showed almost no response. This means the peptide’s GH‑releasing power isn’t universal—it needs the brain‑pituitary connection to work.

Abstract

We evaluated the GH-releasing effect of hexarelin (Hex; 2 microg/kg, i.v.) and GHRH (1 microg/kg, i.v.) in 18 patients (11 males and 7 females, aged 2.5-20.4 yr) with GH deficiency (GHD) whose hypothalamic pituitary abnormalities had been previously characterized by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Ten patients had isolated GHD, and 8 had multiple pituitary hormone deficiency. All patients were receiving appropriate hormone replacement therapy. Twenty-four prepubertal short normal children (11 boys and 13 girls, aged 5.9-13 yr, body weight within +/-10% of ideal weight) served as controls. MRI studies revealed an ectopic posterior pituitary at the infundibular recess in all patients. A residual vascular component of the pituitary stalk was visualized in 8 patients with isolated GHD (group 1), whereas MRI showed the absence of the pituitary stalk (vascular and neural components) in the remaining 10 patients (group 2), of whom 8 had multiple pituitary hormone deficiency and 2 had isolated GHD. In the short normal children, the mean peak GH response to GHRH (24.8 +/- 4.4 microg/L) was significantly lower than that observed after Hex treatment (48.1 +/- 4.9 microg/L; P < 0.0001). In the GHD patients of group 2, the mean peak GH responses to GHRH (1.4 +/- 0.3 microg/L) and Hex (0.9 +/- 0.3 microg/L) were similar and markedly low. In the patients of group 1, the GH responses to GHRH (8.7 +/- 1.3 microg/L) and Hex (7.0 +/- 1.3 microg/L) were also similar, but were significantly higher that those observed in group 2 (P < 0.0001). In the whole group of patients, a significant correlation was found between the GH peaks after Hex and those after GHRH (r = 0.746; P < 0.0001). In this study we have confirmed that the integrity of the hypothalamic pituitary connections is essential for Hex to express its full GH-releasing activity and that Hex is able to stimulate GH secretion in patients with GHD but with a residual vascular component of the pituitary stalk.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

1998

DOI

10.1210/jcem.83.11.5242