Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Hexarelin

Examorelin, HEX

Quick Stats
Studies 233
Trials 61
Score 2
1998 pubmed

Growth hormone status during long-term hexarelin therapy.

Rahim. A A; O'Neill. P A PA; Shalet. S M SM

Key Findings

  • GH response to hexarelin drops after several weeks of continuous dosing (partial tolerance)
  • Serum IGF‑I and IGF‑binding protein‑3 do not change significantly during 16 weeks
  • Body composition, lean mass, fat mass, and bone density remain unchanged
  • Only one bone formation marker (C‑telopeptide of type I collagen) rose modestly

Practical Outcomes

  • Long‑term, twice‑daily hexarelin gives diminishing GH spikes without measurable gains in muscle, fat loss, or bone health, so it’s not a potent stand‑alone anti‑aging tool. If you choose to use hexarelin, consider intermittent or lower‑frequency dosing to avoid tolerance, and don’t expect major changes in body composition or IGF‑1 levels.

Summary

A 16‑week study of twice‑daily hexarelin shots showed that the body’s GH surge gets smaller over time, but overall IGF‑1 levels, muscle, fat, and bone density stay about the same. After stopping the drug, the GH response comes back to normal.

Abstract

Hexarelin, a powerful GH-releasing peptide, is capable of causing profound GH release in normal subjects after oral, intranasal, i.v., and s.c. administration. The effect of long-term administration on GH levels in adults is unknown. We have, therefore, assessed the effects of 16 weeks of twice-daily s.c. hexarelin therapy (1.5 micrograms/kg BW) on the GH response to a single injection of hexarelin, and also the GH response to hexarelin 4 weeks after cessation of hexarelin therapy. We have also assessed the effects of chronic hexarelin therapy on serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I, IGF binding protein-3, markers of bone formation (osteocalcin, procollagen-type-III-N-terminal-peptide, and C-terminal propeptide of type I collagen), and resorption (urinary deoxypyridinoline and pyridinoline), body composition, and bone mineral density. The mean (+/- SEM) area under the GH curve (AUCGH) at weeks 0, 1, 4, 16, and 20 were 19.1 +/- 2.4 micrograms/L.h, 13.1 +/- 2.3 micrograms/L.h, 12.3 +/- 2.4 micrograms/L.h, 10.5 +/- 1.8 micrograms/L.h, and 19.4 +/- 3.7 micrograms/L.h, respectively. There was a significant change in AUCGH over the study period (P = 0.0003). Further analysis showed that, compared with baseline, the decrease in AUCGH at week 4 and week 16 were significant (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). Four weeks after completion of hexarelin therapy, the AUCGH increased significantly, compared with AUCGH at week 16 (P < 0.05), and was not significantly different from that at week 0. Serum IGF-I and IGF binding protein-3 did not change significantly over the 20-week period (P = 0.24 and P = 0.74, respectively). Of the bone markers measured, only serum C-terminal propeptide of type I collagen changed significantly and was higher at week 16, compared with baseline (P = 0.019). Total body fat, lean body mass, and bone mineral density had not changed significantly at week 16, compared with baseline (P = 0.6, P = 0.3, and P = 0.3, respectively). In summary, we have demonstrated that chronic hexarelin therapy results in a partial and reversible attenuation of the GH response to hexarelin. In the present study, the biological impact of this hexarelin schedule on the GH-IGF-I axis seems to be minimal. The therapeutic potential of chronic hexarelin requires further investigation.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

1998

DOI

10.1210/jcem.83.5.4812