Protectant activity of hexarelin or growth hormone against postischemic ventricular dysfunction in hearts from aged rats.
Rossoni. G G; De Gennaro Colonna. V V; Bernareggi. M M; Polvani. G L GL; Müller. E E EE; Berti. F F
Key Findings
- Hexarelin given for three weeks dramatically improves heart recovery after ischemia in aged rats, restoring ~90% of normal pressure
- CK enzyme release (a marker of heart injury) was only doubled with hexarelin versus a 6‑fold rise in controls
- Hexarelin’s benefit occurs without altering growth‑hormone or IGF‑1 levels, suggesting a direct heart‑specific action
- Growth hormone at a higher dose gave only partial protection, highlighting hexarelin’s superior effect
Practical Outcomes
- For biohackers, this study hints that hexarelin could be a powerful cardioprotective agent, especially for aging hearts, but the evidence is limited to rats and no human safety or dosing data exist. Until clinical trials are done, using hexarelin for heart health remains speculative and should be approached with caution.
Summary
In older rats, a 21‑day course of the peptide hexarelin (80 µg/kg twice daily under the skin) almost completely prevented heart damage after a brief blockage of blood flow, working better than the same schedule of growth hormone. The protection showed up as near‑normal heart pressure, much lower enzyme leaks, and only a small rise in coronary pressure, without changing the animals' growth‑hormone system.
Abstract
The ability of hexarelin, a recently synthesized hexapeptide with a strong growth hormone (GH)-releasing activity, or of GH itself to display a protectant activity against postischemic ventricular dysfunction in senescent hearts was studied in 24-month-old male rats. Heart preparations from control (saline-treated) senescent rats, subjected to moderate ischemia, showed at reperfusion: (a) a low recovery of postischemic left ventricular developed pressure (LVDP; 37% of the preischemic values; from 90 +/- 5.7 to 33.5 +/- 3.8 mm Hg; p < 0.01; n = 10) coupled to a substantial increase in coronary perfusion pressure (CPP; 71% over baseline; from 68.3 +/- 5.2 to 116.8 +/- 4.6 mm Hg; p < 0.01; n = 10); (b) a marked increase of creatine kinase (CK) released in the perfusates (6.6-fold increase over preischemic values; from 45 +/- 4 to 298 +/- 25 mU/min/g wet tissue; p < 0.001; n = 10). In vivo administration of hexarelin (80 microg/kg, b.i.d., s.c.) for 21 days resulted in a striking heart protection against reperfusion stunning. In fact, the recovery of LVDP at reperfusion was almost complete (90% of the preischemic values; from 93 +/- 5.8 to 83.7 +/- 5.9 mm Hg; p > 0.05; n = 9), and the increase in coronary resistance was minimal (from 67 +/- 5.8 to 79.7 +/- 6.9 mm Hg; p > 0.05; n = 9). Furthermore, the concentration of CK in the perfusates was increased only twofold (from 45.8 +/- 5.5 to 90 +/- 7.2 mU/min/g wet tissue; p < 0.05; n = 9), with a gradual return toward basal values at the end of reperfusion. The protectant activity of hexarelin was divorced from any detectable alteration of the somatotropic function, as assessed by pituitary GH messenger RNA (mRNA) and plasma insulin-like growth factor I levels. In vivo administration of GH (400 microg/kg b.i.d., s.c.) for the same time lapse resulted in only a partial protectant activity: 55% of LVDP recovery (from 91.5 +/- 6.2 to 50 +/- 3.5 mm Hg; p < 0.01; n = 6); 65% increase of coronary resistance (from 68 +/- 4.3 to 112.2 +/- 5.2 mm Hg; p < 0.01; n = 6); 5.3-fold increase of CK concentrations in heart perfusates on reperfusion (from 43.8 +/- 3.8 to 232 +/- 16 mU/min/g wet tissue; p < 0.001; n = 6). Evaluation of the rate of release of 6-keto-prostaglandin F1alpha (PGF1alpha), the stable metabolite of prostacyclin, in heart perfusates, and assessment of the vasopressor activity of angiotensin II on the coronary vasculature, did not show any change in these parameters among the three experimental groups. Collectively these data indicate that hexarelin displays a strong heart-protectant activity against myocardial stunning in senescent rats. The protection afforded by the peptide is likely due to a direct cardiotropic action and is far greater than that of GH. Neither compound appears able to interfere with the endothelium-dependent relaxant mechanism.
Study Information
pubmed
1998
1998-08-01T00:00:00.000Z
10.1097/00005344-199808000-00013
75
30