Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Hexarelin

Examorelin, HEX

Quick Stats
Studies 233
Trials 61
Score 3
1999 pubmed

Six-week treatment with hexarelin in young dogs: evaluation of the GH responsiveness to acute hexarelin or GHRH administration, and of the orexigenic effect of hexarelin.

Rigamonti. A E AE; Cella. S G SG; Marazzi. N N; Müller. E E EE

Key Findings

  • GH spikes from hexarelin rise early, peak around week 3, then drop back to baseline or below by week 6
  • The GH response to a pure GHRH challenge stays intact even after 6 weeks of hexarelin
  • Hexarelin’s appetite‑boosting effect fades at week 3 and returns by week 6, suggesting multiple receptor types

Practical Outcomes

  • Hexarelin may cause tolerance after a few weeks, so cycling (e.g., 2‑3 weeks on, then off) could keep GH benefits. Pairing hexarelin with a GHRH analog might preserve GH output while reducing down‑regulation. Expect the hunger‑increasing effect to wane mid‑cycle and possibly return later.

Summary

In a 6‑week study on young dogs, giving hexarelin twice daily first boosted growth‑hormone (GH) spikes, especially at week 3, but the boost faded by week 6. The body’s response to a separate GH‑releasing hormone stayed steady, and the appetite‑stimulating effect of hexarelin disappeared mid‑study then came back later, hinting at different brain receptors.

Abstract

In this study we evaluated, in six young (5-7 year-old) beagle dogs, the effects of a 6-week administration of hexarelin (250 microg/kg s. c. twice daily) on the GH response to an acute challenge with hexarelin or GHRH (2 microg/kg i.v.), delivered before and after 3 and 6 weeks of treatment. The GH peak response to acute hexarelin or GHRH initially increased, with a maximum observed at the 3rd week, and then decreased to basal values (GHRH) or less (hexarelin) at the 6th week. These data would indicate that hexarelin initially primed the pituitary to acute administration of further hexarelin or of GHRH, followed by downregulation of the GH response to hexarelin and preservation of the response to GHRH. We then studied the rebound increase in GH secretion after withdrawal of an infusion of somatostatin (4 microg/kg per h for 1.5 h), a likely stimulus of endogenous GHRH function. The pattern obtained was similar to, though not superimposable upon, that ensuing after acute hexarelin or GHRH administration. Parallel evaluation of the acute orexigenic effect of hexarelin evinced a different time-course of the behavioural response, namely an acute feeding response to hexarelin that was abolished at the 3rd week and returned to normal at the 6th week. The differing timing of the neuroendocrine or behavioural response to hexarelin would suggest the existence of different subtypes of central nervous system GH-releasing peptide receptors.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

1999

DOI

10.1530/eje.0.1410313