Alterations in circulating mitochondrial signals at hospital admission for COPD exacerbation.
Amado. Carlos A CA; Martín-Audera. Paula P; Agüero. Juan J; Ferrer-Pargada. Diego D; Josa Laorden. Begoña B; Boucle. Daymara D; Berja. Ana A; Lavín. Bernardo A BA; Guerra. Armando R AR; Ghadban. Cristina C; Muñoz. Pedro P; García-Unzueta. Mayte M
Key Findings
- Humanin levels did not differ between COPD flare patients and stable COPD patients
- Higher than average humanin levels were associated with a 2.7‑fold higher risk of readmission
- Other mitochondrial peptides like MOTS‑c and GDF‑15 showed diagnostic value similar to CRP
Practical Outcomes
- For biohackers, measuring humanin could serve as an early warning sign of future COPD exacerbations, but there’s no known way to modify it yet. It may be useful for personal health tracking and prompting earlier medical attention if levels rise.
Summary
In people hospitalized for a COPD flare, most mitochondrial peptides change, but the level of the peptide humanin (HN) stays the same compared to stable patients. However, higher-than‑average HN levels were linked to a greater chance of being readmitted to the hospital later.
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation (ECOPD) alters the natural course of the disease. To date, only C-reactive protein has been used as a biomarker in ECOPD, but it has important limitations. The mitochondria release peptides (Humanin (HN), FGF-21, GDF-15, MOTS-c and Romo1) under certain metabolic conditions. Here, we aimed to evaluate the pathophysiologic, diagnostic and prognostic value of measuring serum mitochondrial peptides at hospital admission in patients with ECOPD. A total of 51 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital for ECOPD were included and followed for 1 year; in addition, 160 participants with stable COPD from our out-patient clinic were recruited as controls. Serum FGF-21 (<i>p</i> < .001), MOTS-c (<i>p</i> < .001) and Romo1 (<i>p</i> = .002) levels were lower, and GDF-15 (<i>p</i> < .001) levels were higher, in patients with ECOPD than stable COPD, but no differences were found in HN. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, MOTS-c (AUC 0.744, 95% CI 0.679-0.802, <i>p</i> < .001) and GDF-15 (AUC 0.735, 95% CI 0.670-0.793, <i>p</i> < .001) had the best diagnostic power for ECOPD, with a diagnostic accuracy similar to that of C-RP (AUC 0.796 95% IC 0.735-0.848, <i>p</i> < .001). FGF-21 (AUC 0.700, 95% CI 0.633-0.761, <i>p</i> < .001) and Romo1 (AUC 0.645 95% CI 0.573-0.712, <i>p</i> = .001) had lower diagnostic accuracy. HN levels did not differentiate patients with ECOPD versus stable COPD (<i>p</i> = .557). In Cox regression analysis, HN (HR 2.661, CI95% 1.009-7.016, <i>p</i> = .048) and MOTS-c (HR 3.441, CI95% 1.252-9.297, <i>p</i> = .016) levels exceeding mean levels were independent risk factors for re-admission. Most mitochondrial peptides are altered in ECOPD, as compared with stable COPD. MOTS-c and GDF15 levels have a diagnostic accuracy similar to C-RP for ECOPD. HN and MOTS-c independently predict future re-hospitalization.
Study Information
pubmed
2023
2023-01-01T00:00:00.000Z
10.1177/14799731231220058
7
28