Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

IGF-1

Insulin-like Growth Factor 1, Somatomedin C

Quick Stats
Studies 92
Trials 100
Score 1
2025 pubmed

Clinical and Pathological Spectrum of Acromegaly: Distinguishing GH-PitNETs, Mammosomatotrophs and Mixed Tumors.

Martínez-Hernández. Rebeca R; Méndez-García. Fernando F FF; Serrano-Somavilla. Ana A; Sacristán-Gómez. Pablo P; Sánchez de la Blanca. Nuria N; Sampedro-Núñez. Miguel M; Navas-Moreno. Víctor V; Sebastián-Valles. Fernando F; Fernández-Alen. José Antonio JA; Biagetti. Betina B; Ruz-Caracuel. Ignacio I; Araujo-Castro. Marta M; Puig-Domingo. Manel M; Marazuela. Mónica M

Key Findings

  • IGF‑1 levels were not significantly different between GH‑PitNETs and mixed somatotroph‑lactotroph tumors.
  • Mammosomatotroph tumors had higher prolactin (PRL) levels, but many PRL‑positive tumors did not cause high blood PRL (silent PRL).
  • Mixed SL‑PitNETs showed lower expression of somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) and may respond less well to somatostatin analog drugs.

Practical Outcomes

  • For biohackers or self‑experimenters, the findings don’t change how you would use IGF‑1 supplements or affect everyday health protocols. The research mainly informs doctors about tumor subtypes and why some patients might not respond to standard drug therapy.

Summary

The study looked at different kinds of pituitary tumors that cause acromegaly, a condition where the body makes too much growth hormone. It found that the amount of IGF‑1 in the blood was similar across tumor types, while prolactin levels varied. Some tumors had fewer receptors that medicines target, which may make those tumors harder to treat.

Abstract

Acromegaly is a rare disease usually caused by a pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) that produces growth hormone (GH-PitNET). Tumors secreting GH and prolactin (GH&PRL-PitNETs), contribute up to 30% to the spectrum of acromegaly and have been attributed a more aggressive behaviour. GH&PRL PitNETs can be classified in two predominant phenotypes: mammosomatotroph arising from a single-cell population of Pit-1 lineage and mixed somatotroph-lactotroph PitNETs (mixed SL-PitNETs). To evaluate clinical and molecular differences between GH-PitNET, mammosomatotroph, and mixed SL-PitNETs. We quantified GH and PRL expression by double immunofluorescence in 51 PitNETs (23 GH-PitNETs, 20 mammosomatotrophs, and 8 mixed SL-PitNETs) from patients with acromegaly. These findings were correlated with clinical data and histologic markers such as SSTR2, SSTR3, SSTR5, E-cadherin, and CAM 5.2. Our results did not reveal significant differences in GH or IGF-1 levels between GH- PitNETs and mixed SL-PitNETs, but PRL levels were significantly higher in mammosomatotrophs. Tumor size and invasiveness were comparable between the two groups. Interestingly, 41% of PRL-positive tumors did not show hyperprolactinemia representing silent PRL-positive GH PitNETs. Mixed SL-PitNETs exhibited reduced SSTR2 expression, while GH-PitNETs exhibit higher SSTR5 levels. Moreover, all tumors lacking cytokeratin expression were non-responders to medical therapy. These findings highlight the heterogeneity within GH&PRL-PitNETs, including silent PRL-positive GH PitNETs. Our data suggest mixed-SL tumors may be less responsive to somatostatin receptor ligands, emphasizing the need for tailored strategies based on tumor subtype and receptor profile.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2025

Date

2025-11-26T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1210/clinem/dgaf634