Direct comparison of the effects of intravenous kisspeptin-10, kisspeptin-54 and GnRH on gonadotrophin secretion in healthy men.
Jayasena. C N CN; Abbara. A A; Narayanaswamy. S S; Comninos. A N AN; Ratnasabapathy. R R; Bassett. P P; Mogford. J T JT; Malik. Z Z; Calley. J J; Ghatei. M A MA; Bloom. S R SR; Dhillo. W S WS
Key Findings
- Kisspeptin‑10 and kisspeptin‑54 increase LH and FSH in humans when infused intravenously.
- The two kisspeptin isoforms produce similar hormone responses.
- GnRH is roughly 2‑3 times more potent than either kisspeptin isoform at the same dose.
Practical Outcomes
- For DIY hormone enthusiasts, kisspeptin can stimulate the reproductive axis but requires higher doses than GnRH to get comparable effects, and it must be given intravenously, which limits real‑world use. The study suggests no clear advantage of one kisspeptin isoform over the other, so choosing between them isn’t critical.
Summary
In a small study of healthy men, giving kisspeptin‑10 or kisspeptin‑54 through an IV raised the hormones LH and FSH, but not as strongly as the standard hormone GnRH. Both kisspeptin forms worked about the same, and the effect grew with higher doses.
Abstract
How potently does the novel hypothalamic stimulator of reproduction, kisspeptin, increase gonadotrophin secretion when compared with GnRH in healthy men? At the doses tested, intravenous administration of either of two major kisspeptin isoforms, kisspeptin-10 and -54, was associated with similar levels of gonadotrophin secretion in healthy men; however, GnRH was more potent when compared with either kisspeptin isoform. Kisspeptin-10 and -54 are naturally occurring hormones in the kisspeptin peptide family which potently stimulates endogenous GnRH secretion from the hypothalamus, so have the potential to treat patients with reproductive disorders. Rodent studies suggest that kisspeptin-54 is more potent when compared with kisspepitn-10; however, their effects have not previously been directly compared in humans, or compared with direct pituitary stimulation of gonadotrophin secretion using GnRH. A single-blinded placebo controlled physiological study was performed from January to December 2013. Local ethical approval was granted, and five participants were recruited to each dosing group. Healthy men were administered vehicle, kisspeptin-10, kisspeptin-54 and GnRH intravenously for 3 h on different study days. Each hormone was administered at 0.1, 0.3 and 1.0 nmol/kg/h doses (n = 5 subjects per group). Regular blood sampling was conducted throughout the study to measure LH and FSH. Study visits were conducted at least a week apart. Serum LH and FSH levels were ∼3-fold higher during GnRH infusion when compared with kisspeptin-10 and ∼2-fold higher when compared with kisspeptin-54 [mean area under the curve serum LH during infusion (in hours times international units per litre, h.IU/l): 10.81 ± 1.73, 1.0 nmol/kg/h kisspeptin-10; 14.43 ± 1.27, 1.0 nmol/kg/h kisspeptin-54; 34.06 ± 5.18, 1.0 nmol/kg/h GnRH, P < 0.001 versus kisspeptin-10, P < 0.01 versus kisspeptin-54]. This study had a small sample size. Kisspeptin offers a novel means of stimulating the reproductive axis. Our data suggest that kisspeptin stimulates gonadotrophin secretion less potently when compared with GnRH; however, kisspeptin may stimulate gonadotrophins in a more physiological manner when compared with current therapies. Kisspeptin is emerging as a future therapeutic agent, so it is important to establish which kisspeptin hormones could be used to treat patients with infertility. Results of this study suggest that either isoform has similar effects on reproductive hormone secretion in healthy men when administered intravenously. This work is funded by grants from the MRC and NIHR and is supported by the NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre Funding Scheme. C.N.J. is supported by an NIHR Clinical Lectureship. A.A. is supported by Wellcome Trust Research Training Fellowships. A.N.C. is supported by Wellcome Trust Translational Medicine Training Fellowship. W.S.D. is supported by an NIHR Career Development Fellowship.
Study Information
pubmed
2015
2015-06-18T00:00:00.000Z
10.1093/humrep/dev143
42
77