Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Kisspeptin-10

KP-10, Metastin (45-54), Kisspeptin-10 (human), KiSS-1

Quick Stats
Studies 877
Trials 47
2011 pubmed 20 citations

Comparative expression profiles for KiSS-1 and REN genes in preeclamptic and healthy placental tissues.

Vazquez-Alaniz. Fernando F; Galaviz-Hernandez. Carlos C; Marchat. Laurence A LA; Salas-Pacheco. José M JM; Chairez-Hernandez. Isaías I; Guijarro-Bustillos. José J JJ; Mireles-Ordaz. Alberto A

Key Findings

  • KiSS-1 expression is significantly higher in preeclamptic placental tissue
  • Overall REN expression isn’t different, but it’s higher in mild preeclampsia and linked to disease severity
  • Gene expression patterns may reflect the body’s response to preeclampsia rather than a direct therapeutic target

Practical Outcomes

  • For the biohacker community, this work offers no direct actions or protocols. It’s a pregnancy‑specific finding that doesn’t translate to general longevity, metabolic, or performance strategies.

Summary

The study looked at two genes, KiSS-1 and REN, in placentas from women with preeclampsia versus healthy pregnancies. It found that KiSS-1 levels were higher in preeclamptic placentas, while REN levels only rose in milder cases and were affected by how severe the disease was. The research is about pregnancy complications, not about using kisspeptin-10 for health or performance improvement.

Abstract

The aim of the present work was to look at differences in the placental tissue expression of KiSS-1 and REN genes from preeclamptic and healthy pregnant women, that could account for a possible synergistic function for both genes in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. This case-control study involved 27 preeclamptic women and 27 normoevolutive pregnant women. cDNA was obtained from placental tissue to carry out qPCR for both KiSS-1 and REN genes in order to compare mRNA expression levels in the studied groups. Statistical analysis showed expression differences that correlate with clinical and/or biochemical variables. Higher expression for KiSS-1 in PEE vs. control woman (p=0.001) was observed, whereas no difference was observed for REN expression (p=0.300) when all the subjects were included. However, REN expression was significant higher when the samples were stratified according to preeclampsia severity. For 18 mild preeclamptic patients the p-value was p=0.001 compared to their controls, while for the remaining nine with severe preeclampsia the expression became significant (p=0.001). Our results suggest that the high KiSS-1 expression seen in preeclamptic patients is in accordance with its role as an inhibitor of trophoblast invasiveness and maintained until the end of gestation. On the other hand, aggressive therapeutic management and/or severity status of patients have a direct effect on placental REN expression levels, masking the natural high expression of this gene on preeclamptic placental tissue. Therefore it was not possible to establish a real concordant expression profile for KiSS-1 and REN genes.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2011

Date

2011-08-09T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.07.019

Citations

20

References

43