Functional analyses of melanocortin-4 receptor mutations identified from patients with binge eating disorder and nonobese or obese subjects.
Tao. Ya-Xiong YX; Segaloff. Deborah L DL
Key Findings
- Loss‑of‑function MC4R variants (I102T, N240S) were found in non‑obese people.
- MC4R variants from binge‑eating patients (T11A, F51L, T112M, M200V) behaved like normal receptors in the lab.
- Not all MC4R changes in obese subjects cause loss of function, so a mutation alone doesn’t prove it causes obesity.
Practical Outcomes
- There are no actionable recommendations for melanotan‑I dosing or use based on this work. It mainly shows that MC4R genetics are complex and not a simple target for weight or eating‑behavior hacks. More research is needed before any protocol changes.
Summary
The study tested how different genetic changes in the MC4R protein affect its activity in cells. Some changes that reduce function were found in people who aren’t obese, and the changes seen in binge‑eating patients worked normally. This means you can’t assume a MC4R mutation automatically causes obesity or binge eating, and the findings don’t give any direct tips for using melanotan‑I.
Abstract
Whether mutations in the melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) are the cause of binge eating disorder was controversial. In addition, the penetrance of mutations in the MC4R in causing obesity was debated. We investigated whether MC4R variants identified from obese patients with binge eating disorder (T11A, F51L, T112M, and M200V) and variants identified in nonobese (I102T, F202L, and N240S) or obese (I102S, A154D, and S295P) subjects cause loss-of-function and what are the defects. Variant or wild-type MC4Rs were expressed in HEK293 cells and examined for their pharmacological characteristics. The study setting was in vitro bench-top laboratory experiments. Ligand binding, signaling, and cell surface expression of the variant MC4Rs were compared with wild-type MC4R. Our data clearly show a loss-of-function phenotype in vitro for I102T and N240S variants identified in nonobese individuals. Furthermore, not all MC4R variants identified in obese subjects exhibit a loss-of-function phenotype in vitro. Finally, the MC4R variants T11A, F51L, T112M, and M200V identified from patients with binge eating disorder displayed normal function with regards to the parameters measured in our study. Patients harboring loss-of-function MC4R mutations do not always exhibit obesity. Novel MC4R variant identified from an obese patient cannot be assumed to be the cause of obesity without demonstrating a loss-of-function phenotype in vitro for the variant MC4R. Whether MC4R mutations are involved in the pathogenesis of binge eating disorder needs additional investigation.
Study Information
pubmed
2005
2005-07-19T00:00:00.000Z
10.1210/jc.2005-0519