Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Sermorelin

GHRH (1-29), GRF 1-29 NH2, Sermorelin acetate

Quick Stats
Studies 223
Trials 41
Score 1
2011 pubmed 19 citations

The effect of a novel antagonist of growth hormone releasing hormone on cell proliferation and on the key cell signaling pathways in nine different breast cancer cell lines.

Pozsgai. Eva E; Schally. Andrew V AV; Hocsak. Eniko E; Zarandi. Marta M; Rick. Ferenc F; Bellyei. Szabolcs S

Key Findings

  • The GHRH antagonist MIA‑602 reduced viability of all nine breast‑cancer cell lines tested.
  • Both the main GHRH receptor (pGHRH‑R) and its splice variant SV1 were present, with SV1 on all lines.
  • MIA‑602 lowered phosphorylated Akt, GSK3β, and ERK1/2 while raising phosphorylated p38, indicating altered cell‑signaling.

Practical Outcomes

  • For DIY health enthusiasts using sermorelin (a GHRH agonist), this study doesn’t provide direct guidance. It simply suggests that blocking GHRH might have anti‑cancer effects in labs, but there’s no evidence it translates to human use or informs dosing protocols.

Summary

This lab study tested a new drug that blocks growth‑hormone‑releasing hormone (GHRH) and found it can kill breast‑cancer cells in a dish, even those that don’t have the usual hormone receptors. It works by shutting down cell‑survival signals and turning on stress pathways, but the work is only in cell cultures, not people.

Abstract

Growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) antagonists have been developed for the treatment of various cancers. We investigated the effects of a novel GHRH antagonist, MIA-602, on nine breast cancer cell lines, differing in their expression for estrogen-, progesterone- and HER-2 receptors. We detected the presence of pituitary-type GHRH receptors (pGHRH-R) on 6 of the 9 breast cancer cell lines. The main splice variant of pGHRH-R, SV1, was found on all 9 cell lines. MTT assay showed that following treatment with MIA-602, cell viability decreased significantly in all 9 cell lines. The reduction in cell viability was greater in cells positive for both pGHRH-R and SV1, than in cells positive for only SV1, but the difference was not significant. Using Western blotting, we demonstrated that the levels of phospho-Akt, -GSK3β and -ERK1/2 decreased significantly following exposure to MIA-602 and the level of phospho-p38 increased after treatment. The reduction of the phosphorylated anti-apoptotic proteins was significantly greater in cells where both pGHRH-R and SV1 were present, than where only SV1 was expressed. In conclusion, our study shows that MIA-602 is effective against a wide range of breast cancer cells in vitro, independently of their receptor positivity, suggesting the potential use of GHRH antagonists also in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. The effect of MIA-602 was mediated nearly as well in tumors that expressed only the SV1 receptor compared to those in which both SV1 and pGHRH-R were present, although a difference could be detected at the level of cell signaling.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2011

Date

2011-06-23T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.3892/ijo.2011.1098

Citations

19

References

43