Intranasal administration of growth hormone-releasing hormone(1-29)-NH2 in children with growth hormone deficiency: effects on growth hormone secretion and growth.
Hümmelink. R R; Sippell. W G WG; Benoit. K G KG; Danielson. K K; Faijerson. Y Y
Key Findings
- Initial nasal doses produced brief spikes in growth hormone levels
- Effectiveness dropped over weeks as absorption fell and antibodies appeared
- No sustained increase in height growth; many participants experienced nasal irritation
Practical Outcomes
- For self‑experimenters, intranasal sermorelin isn’t a reliable way to boost growth hormone or improve growth. The route loses potency quickly, can trigger immune reactions, and causes uncomfortable nasal side effects. Stick to proven methods or other secretagogues if you’re seeking GH support.
Summary
A small study gave kids with growth hormone deficiency a nasal spray of a hormone that normally tells the body to make growth hormone. It caused short bursts of hormone at first, but the effect faded, antibodies formed, and kids got nose irritation. Overall, it didn’t help them grow taller over six months.
Abstract
The growth-promoting potential of growth hormone-releasing hormone(1-29)-NH2 (GHRH(1-29)-NH2) in a new formulation for intranasal use was examined in a 6-month pilot study of eight short prepubertal children. The maximal plasma concentration of growth hormone (GH) was below 12 micrograms/l in two stimulation tests (arginine, insulin), but above 12 (24-90) micrograms/l after intravenous GHRH, 1 microgram/kg. GHRH, 50 micrograms/kg, was insufflated intranasally three times per day over 6 months. On day 1, GHRH insufflations were followed by distinct GHRH and GH plasma peaks, ranging from 1.2 to 5.4 micrograms/l and from 10 to 85 mIU/l, respectively. Peak amplitudes were variably reduced after 6 weeks in most patients, and further reduced at 6 months. GHRH antibodies (initially negative) were positive in three patients after 6 weeks. The mean knemometric growth rate rose from 0.24 to 0.48 mm/week after 6 weeks of treatment (p = 0.03) and then rapidly declined; the mean 6-month stadiometric height velocity did not increase. Local tolerance was good in one patient; most others reported sneezing immediately after insufflation, rhinorrhoea and mild mucosal burning. Treatment was discontinued in two patients after 6 and 12 weeks. It is concluded that intranasal GHRH, though non-invasive, is not suitable in its present form for use in children, because of decreasing absorption and effectiveness with concomitant development of antibodies and local reactions.
Study Information
pubmed
1993
1993-06-01T00:00:00.000Z
10.1111/j.1651-2227.1993.tb12830.x
11
12