Effect of age and intake on growth hormone kinetics in dairy heifers.
Lapierre. H H; Farmer. C C; Girard. C C; Brazeau. P P
Key Findings
- Aging increased GH metabolic clearance rate and plasma volume, lowering basal GH concentrations
- GH secretion rate was unchanged across ages and feeding levels
- Feed restriction lowered GH clearance but did not raise basal GH levels
Practical Outcomes
- For longevity or performance enthusiasts, the data hint that age‑related drops in GH may be due to faster clearance, and mild calorie restriction is unlikely to boost GH meaningfully. However, since the research is in cows, it offers little concrete guidance for human GH‑related protocols.
Summary
This animal study found that older cows clear growth hormone faster and have lower baseline levels, while cutting feed a bit slows clearance but doesn’t raise hormone levels. The hormone’s release rate stayed the same regardless of age or diet. Because it’s done in dairy heifers, the direct take‑away for human biohackers is limited.
Abstract
The effects of aging and intake on growth hormone (GH) kinetics and GH-releasing factor (GRF)-induced GH concentrations were studied in two groups of 12 Holstein heifers each (80 d, 85 kg: young; and 273 d of age, 246 kg: old). Each group was then equally subdivided into full-fed (FF) and restricted-fed (RF) subgroups. After 11 d of intake treatment, animals were infused for 3 hr with GH (1.5 mg/hr) in order to calculate GH metabolic clearance rate (MCR), secretion rate (SR) and half-life (t 1/2). Two d later, total plasma volume was determined and the following day, all heifers received a GRF challenge (5 micrograms/kg i.v.). The following values are LSM +/- SE for young-FF, young-RF, old-FF and old-RF. Rate of secretion was not affected by any treatment, averaging 1.51, 1.25, 1.34, and 1.40 +/- .23 micrograms/min. Aging increased (P < .01) MCR (186, 159, 382, and 300 +/- 21 ml/min) and increased plasma volume (P < .01), which resulted in lower basal GH concentrations. Aging also decreased (P < .01) the area under the GH response curve following GRF injection (AUC: 12442, 21114, 5155, and 6308 +/- 1776 ng.min/ml) but did not affect average GH quantity in the plasma after the GRF challenge. Feed restriction decreased (P < .05) MCR, but not enough to affect basal GH concentrations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Study Information
pubmed
1992
10.1016/0739-7240(92)90033-t