Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Sermorelin

GHRH (1-29), GRF 1-29 NH2, Sermorelin acetate

Quick Stats
Studies 223
Trials 41
Score 3
1989 pubmed

Effects of intranasal calcitonin administration on pituitary GH response to hGHRH (1-29)NH2 in normal adult subjects.

Giustina. A A; Romanelli. G G; Doga. M M; Pizzocolo. G G; Giustina. G G

Key Findings

  • Intranasal or intramuscular salmon calcitonin reduced GH peaks after a GHRH injection by more than half.
  • Both routes of calcitonin delivery lowered the overall GH area‑under‑the‑curve significantly (p<0.001).
  • The inhibition was observed in healthy young adults, suggesting a direct suppressive effect of calcitonin on pituitary GH release.

Practical Outcomes

  • If you’re using sermorelin or other GHRH analogues to boost growth hormone, avoid taking calcitonin (e.g., for osteoporosis) at the same time, as it may blunt the desired GH surge. Timing them far apart or skipping calcitonin could preserve sermorelin’s effectiveness.

Summary

A small study found that giving salmon calcitonin, either as a nasal spray or injection, sharply cuts the growth hormone boost you get from a direct GHRH stimulus. This means calcitonin can block the effect of GHRH‑based drugs like sermorelin, so using them together could make the GH‑raising benefits weaker.

Abstract

Studies in man demonstrated that intramuscular salmon (s) calcitonin (CT) administration blunted pituitary GH response to hypothalamic stimuli such as arginine infusion and insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. However, the mechanisms underlying this inhibiting action of CT are still unclear. The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of intranasal (i.n.) and i.m. sCT administration on GH secretion elicited by direct pituitary stimulation in man with human GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) (1-29)NH2. Seven healthy non-obese volunteers (five men, two women; mean age +/- SDM 25 +/- 2) underwent a bolus intravenous injection of GHRH, 100 micrograms, alone or associated with sCT, administered either i.n., 300 IU, or i.m., 100 IU. Our data demonstrate a significant decrease in GH secretion after GHRH when either i.n. or i.m. sCT is administered. GH peak (mean +/- SDM); GHRH alone 22.9 +/- 2.5 vs GHRH plus i.n. sCT, 8.9 +/- 1.5 micrograms/l, P less than 0.001; or vs GHRH plus i.m. sCT 12.3 +/- 2.5 micrograms/l, P less than 0.001. Area under the curve of GH secretion: GHRH alone 1211 +/- 196 vs GHRH plus i.n. sCT 551 +/- 116 micrograms 120 min/l. P less than 0.001; or vs GHRH plus i.m. sCT 700 +/- 167 micrograms 120 min/l, P less than 0.001. We conclude that sCT is able to inhibit GHRH-stimulated GH secretion in man.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

1989

DOI

10.1111/j.1365-2265.1989.tb00276.x