Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Sermorelin

GHRH (1-29), GRF 1-29 NH2, Sermorelin acetate

Quick Stats
Studies 223
Trials 41
Score 3
1985 pubmed

Growth hormone-releasing factor analogue (hGRF1-29NH2): immunoreactive-GRF plasma levels after intravenous and subcutaneous administration.

Rafferty. B B; Poole. S S; Clarke. R R; Schulster. D D

Key Findings

  • Initial distribution half‑life ≈1.9 min, elimination half‑life ≈10.4 min in rats
  • Sub‑cutaneous injection delivers only ~4% of the dose to circulation compared to IV
  • Rapid degradation occurs either at the injection site or during transfer to blood

Practical Outcomes

  • Because sermorelin is cleared in minutes and has poor skin‑injection bioavailability, frequent dosing, higher doses, or alternative delivery methods (e.g., IV infusion or more stable analogues) are needed for any meaningful effect. Biohackers should not expect a single sub‑Q shot to boost growth hormone for long periods.

Summary

The study shows that sermorelin (a growth‑hormone‑releasing factor) disappears from the blood very quickly and only a tiny amount (about 4%) gets into the bloodstream when injected under the skin, likely because it breaks down fast at the injection site.

Abstract

A homologous radioimmunoassay (RIA) system for human growth hormone-releasing factor 1-29NH2 (hGRF 1-29-NH2) was developed and applied to the measurement of immunoreactive (IR) concentrations of the peptide in anaesthetized rats to determine some of its pharmaco-kinetics after i.v. and s.c. administration. Analysis of the biphasic disappearance curve of IR-hGRF-1-29NH2 from plasma after i.v. injection (10 micrograms) gave values for the half-lives of the initial distribution phase (alpha) and for the elimination phase (beta) of 1.9 +/- 0.2 min and 10.4 +/- 0.2 min respectively. There was rapid uptake of the peptide from the site of s.c. injection but comparison of areas under the plasma IR-hGRF1-29NH2/time curves showed that the estimated total amount in the circulation after s.c. injection was only 4% of that obtained after i.v. administration. A large degree of degradation of the peptide is indicated either at the site of injection or during transfer to plasma; this susceptibility to rapid breakdown is reflected in the short half-life of the peptide in the circulation. Therefore the measurement of the above parameters is a prerequisite when assessing potency of GRF analogues in-vivo and when implementing suitable dosage regimens for clinical purposes.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

1985

DOI

10.1677/joe.0.107r005