Growth acceleration in children with chronic renal failure treated with growth-hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH).
Pasqualini. T T; Ferraris. J J; Fainstein-Day. P P; Eymann. A A AA; Moyano Caturelly. S S; Ruiz. S S; Ramirez. J J; Gutman. R R
Key Findings
- 5 of 9 children showed increased growth velocity after 3‑6 months of sermorelin
- No consistent changes in kidney function were observed
- Children who responded had lower initial GH response to a test than non‑responders
Practical Outcomes
- For biohackers, the data suggest sermorelin can boost growth in some growth‑restricted kids, but the effect is inconsistent and the study is very small. It doesn’t provide a clear, safe protocol for adults seeking anti‑aging or performance benefits, and more research is needed before practical use.
Summary
A small study gave a growth‑hormone‑releasing peptide (sermorelin) to nine kids with kidney disease. Five of them grew faster, but the others didn’t, and the treatment didn’t change kidney function. The results are modest and only apply to children with chronic renal failure, not healthy adults.
Abstract
Growth retardation is a prominent clinical manifestation in children with chronic renal failure (CRF). Nine children with CRF (3 on conservative treatment; 3 on dialysis and 3 after renal transplantation) aged 1.6 to 14.0 (x +/- SE: 8.1 +/- 1.4) years, were treated with twice daily subcutaneous injections of 26 +/- 2.4 micrograms/kg/day growth-hormone-releasing-hormone [GHRH (1-29) NH2 Serono (Geref)] during 3 to 6 months. Mean serum urea and creatinine remained stable, although 2 patients on conservative treatment showed a moderate increase in serum creatinine. At the start of the study, height SDS was -2.2 +/- 0.2 (x +/- SE), growth velocity was 4.5 +/- 1.0 cm/year (-2.3 +/- 0.6 DS for chronological age) and growth hormone (GH) response to acute GHRH test (1 microgram/kg IV) was 62 +/- 17.5 ng/ml. Five patients increased height velocity from 3.8 +/- 0.7 to 8.0 +/- 1.2 cm/year (paired t test, p < 0.05). The peak GH response to GHRH was significantly higher in the group of growth non-responders than in the responders (p < 0.05). In conclusion, 5 out of 9 short children with CRF, 3 on conservative treatment, 1 on dialysis and 1 post renal transplantation, showed improved growth in response to GHRH therapy. No consistent effect on renal function was detected. GHRH may be an alternative therapy to increase growth velocity in patients with CRF.
Study Information
pubmed
1996