Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Tesamorelin

Egrifta, TH9507

Quick Stats
Studies 64
Trials 24
Score 3
2021 pubmed

Tesamorelin improves fat quality independent of changes in fat quantity.

Lake. Jordan E JE; La. Kristen K; Erlandson. Kristine M KM; Adrian. Stefan S; Yenokyan. Gayane G; Scherzinger. Ann A; Dubé. Michael P MP; Stanley. Takara T; Grinspoon. Steven S; Falutz. Julian J; Mamputu. Jean-Claude JC; Marsolais. Christian C; McComsey. Grace A GA; Brown. Todd T TT

Key Findings

  • Tesamorelin increased visceral and subcutaneous fat density (quality) over 26 weeks
  • The density gains were independent of how much fat volume changed
  • Effects remained after adjusting for baseline fat amount and size

Practical Outcomes

  • For biohackers interested in body composition, tesamorelin may offer a way to improve the health of existing fat tissue, not just reduce its size. However, the data come from HIV‑positive participants, so results may not fully translate to the general population. If you consider using tesamorelin, monitor both fat volume and imaging‑based quality metrics, and be aware that dosing and safety need professional oversight.

Summary

Tesamorelin, a drug that mimics a hormone that tells the body to release growth hormone, not only shrinks belly fat in people with HIV but also makes the remaining fat denser, which means the fat cells are smaller and healthier. This improvement in fat quality happens even if the total amount of fat doesn’t change much.

Abstract

Fat quality and quantity may affect health similarly or differently. Fat quality can be assessed by measuring fat density on CT scan (greater density = smaller, higher quality adipocytes). We assessed the effects of tesamorelin, a growth hormone-releasing hormone analogue that reduces visceral fat (VAT) quantity in some people living with HIV (PWH), on fat density. Participants from two completed, placebo-controlled, randomized trials of tesamorelin for central adiposity treatment in PWH were included if they had either a clinical response to tesamorelin (VAT decrease ≥8%, ≈70% of participants) or were placebo-treated. CT VAT and subcutaneous fat (SAT) density (Hounsfield Units, HU) were measured by a central blinded reader. Participants (193 responders, 148 placebo) were 87% male and 83% white. Baseline characteristics were similar across arms, including VAT (-91 HU both arms, P = 0.80) and SAT density (-94 HU tesamorelin, -95 HU placebo, P = 0.29). Over 26 weeks, mean (SD) VAT and SAT density increased in tesamorelin-treated participants only [VAT: +6.2 (8.7) HU tesamorelin, +0.3 (4.2) HU placebo, P < 0.0001; SAT: +4.0 (8.7) HU tesamorelin, +0.3 (4.8) HU placebo, P < 0.0001]. The tesamorelin effects persisted after controlling for baseline VAT or SAT HU and area, and VAT [+2.3 HU, 95% confidence interval (4.5-7.3), P = 0.001) or SAT (+3.5 HU, 95% confidence interval (2.3-4.7), P < 0.001] area change. In PWH with central adiposity who experienced VAT quantity reductions on tesamorelin, VAT and SAT density increased independent of changes in fat quantity, suggesting that tesamorelin also improves VAT and SAT quality in this group.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2021

Date

2021-07-15T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1097/qad.0000000000002897