Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Tesamorelin

Egrifta, TH9507

Quick Stats
Studies 64
Trials 24
Score 4
2010 pubmed 85 citations

Effects of tesamorelin (TH9507), a growth hormone-releasing factor analog, in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with excess abdominal fat: a pooled analysis of two multicenter, double-blind placebo-controlled phase 3 trials with safety extension data.

Falutz. Julian J; Mamputu. Jean-Claude JC; Potvin. Diane D; Moyle. Graeme G; Soulban. Graziella G; Loughrey. Helen H; Marsolais. Christian C; Turner. Ralph R; Grinspoon. Steven S

Key Findings

  • Visceral fat dropped ~24 cm² (≈15%) vs. slight gain on placebo after 26 weeks
  • Triglycerides and cholesterol/HDL ratio improved significantly
  • IGF‑I rose sharply but glucose levels stayed stable
  • Benefits persisted through 52 weeks in those staying on tesamorelin

Practical Outcomes

  • For biohackers aiming to reduce deep belly fat, a 2 mg daily subcutaneous dose of tesamorelin shows strong, lasting effects and improves lipid profiles without worsening glucose. It’s well‑tolerated, so it could be considered in protocols targeting visceral adiposity, especially if you’re already monitoring IGF‑I and have no contraindications.

Summary

Tesamorelin, a daily 2 mg injection, cuts belly fat (visceral fat) by about 15% in HIV patients on ART after 6 months, keeps the loss for a year, improves cholesterol and triglycerides, and makes people feel better about their midsection, all without hurting blood sugar.

Abstract

HIV patients treated with antiretroviral therapy (ART) often develop increased visceral adipose tissue (VAT). Our objective was to perform a pooled analysis of two phase-3 studies of tesamorelin in ART-treated HIV patients with excess abdominal fat. Two multicenter, international studies were conducted; a 26-wk randomized, placebo-controlled primary intervention phase was followed by a 26-wk safety extension. A total of 806 ART-treated HIV patients with excess abdominal fat were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to receive tesamorelin 2 mg (n = 543) or placebo (n = 263) sc daily. At wk 26, patients initially on tesamorelin were rerandomized to 2 mg tesamorelin (T-T group, n = 246) or placebo (T-P, n = 135) for an additional 26 wk, whereas patients on placebo were switched to tesamorelin (P-T, n = 197). Tesamorelin (GHRH(1-44)) at a dose of 2 mg or identical placebo, sc, was given daily. We evaluated percent change in VAT by computed tomography scan at wk 26. At wk 26, VAT decreased significantly in tesamorelin-treated patients (-24 +/- 41 vs. 2 +/- 35 cm(2), tesamorelin vs. placebo, P < 0.001; treatment effect, -15.4%). No significant changes were observed in abdominal sc adipose tissue (-2 +/- 32 vs. 2 +/- 29 cm(2), P = 0.08; treatment effect, -0.6%). Treatment with tesamorelin resulted in significant decreases in triglycerides (-37 +/- 139 vs. 6 +/- 112 mg/dl, P < 0.001; treatment effect, -12.3%) and cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein ratio (-0.18 +/- 1.00 vs. 0.18 +/- 0.94, P < 0.001; treatment effect, -7.2%) vs. placebo. Tesamorelin improved body image [belly appearance distress (P = 0.002)], patient rating of belly profile (P = 0.003), and physician rating of belly profile (P < 0.001). Mean IGF-I increased 108 +/- 112 vs.-7 +/- 64 ng/ml (P < 0.001 vs. placebo). At wk 52, decreases in VAT [-35 +/- 50 cm(2) (-17.5 +/- 23.3%)], waist circumference (-3.4 +/- 6.0 cm), triglycerides (-48 +/- 182 mg/dl), cholesterol (-8 +/- 38 mg/dl), and non-high-density lipoprotein (-7 +/- 38 mg/dl) were maintained (all P < 0.001 vs. original baseline) in the T-T group. Treatment with tesamorelin was generally well tolerated. No clinically meaningful differences were observed between groups in glucose parameters at wk 26 and 52. Treatment with tesamorelin reduces VAT and maintains the reduction for up to 52 wk, preserves abdominal sc adipose tissue, improves body image and lipids, and is overall well tolerated without clinically meaningful changes in glucose parameters.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2010

Date

2010-06-16T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1210/jc.2010-0490

Citations

85

References

35