Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Tesamorelin

Egrifta, TH9507

Quick Stats
Studies 64
Trials 24
Score 3
2013 pubmed 9 citations

The effects of tesamorelin on phosphocreatine recovery in obese subjects with reduced GH.

Makimura. Hideo H; Murphy. Caitlin A CA; Feldpausch. Meghan N MN; Grinspoon. Steven K SK

Key Findings

  • Tesamorelin caused a large increase in IGF‑1 compared to placebo (≈103 ”g/L vs 23 ”g/L).
  • Higher IGF‑1 gains were positively correlated with faster phosphocreatine recovery (R≈0.56 overall, R≈0.71 in the tesamorelin group).
  • The IGF‑1–PCr recovery relationship remained significant after adjusting for demographics and body‑composition/insulin‑sensitivity factors.

Practical Outcomes

  • Tesamorelin may be a tool to boost IGF‑1 and improve mitochondrial energy recovery, which could benefit endurance and metabolic health. However, the benefit was shown only in obese people with reduced GH, and the drug requires a prescription and monitoring of IGF‑1 levels. Biohackers should weigh the need for medical supervision and consider whether the potential mitochondrial gain justifies the cost and regulatory hurdles.

Summary

In a 12‑month trial, giving the peptide tesamorelin to obese adults with low growth hormone raised their IGF‑1 levels a lot and this boost was linked to faster recovery of phosphocreatine after exercise, a sign that their mitochondria worked better. The link stayed strong even after accounting for age, sex, body fat and insulin sensitivity.

Abstract

Few studies have assessed the relationship between GH and mitochondrial function. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of improving IGF-I using a GHRH analog, tesamorelin, on mitochondrial function assessed by phosphocreatine (PCr) recovery using (31)P magnetic resonance spectroscopy in obese adults with reduced GH. A total of 39 obese men and women with reduced GH secretion as determined by GHRH-arginine stimulation tests underwent magnetic resonance spectroscopy as part of a 12-month, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial comparing tesamorelin vs placebo. PCr recovery after submaximal exercise was assessed at baseline and at 12 months. At baseline, there were no differences in age, sex, race/ethnicity, and GH or PCr parameters between tesamorelin and placebo. After 12 months, tesamorelin treatment led to a significantly greater increase in IGF-I than did placebo treatment (change, 102.9±31.8 μg/L vs 22.8±8.9 μg/L, tesamorelin vs placebo; P=.02). We demonstrated a significant positive relationship between increases in IGF-I and improvements in PCr recovery represented as ViPCr (R=0.56; P=.01). The association between IGF-I and PCr recovery was even stronger among subjects treated with tesamorelin only (ViPCr: R=0.71; P=.03). This association remained significant after controlling for age, sex, race, ethnicity, and parameters of body composition and insulin sensitivity (all P<.05). Increases in IGF-I from 12 months of treatment with tesamorelin were significantly associated with improvements in PCr recovery parameters in obese men and women with reduced GH secretion, suggestive of improvements in mitochondrial function.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2013

Date

2013-12-20T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1210/jc.2013-3436

Citations

9

References

18