Thymosin alpha 1 as an adjuvant to hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in an experimental model of peritoneal metastases from colonic carcinoma.
Nevo. Nadav N; Lee Goldstein. Adam A; Bar-David. Shoshi S; Natanson. Maya M; Alon. Gilad G; Lahat. Guy G; Nizri. Eran E
Key Findings
- Thymosin‑alpha‑1 raised overall survival when combined with HIPEC in mice
- The peptide did not directly stop tumor cell growth
- It shifted the immune environment toward a Th1 response and increased CD8+ T‑cell infiltration into tumors
Practical Outcomes
- This result is interesting for cancer researchers but isn’t ready for personal use. The study was done in mice with a very specific cancer treatment, so there’s no safe, proven protocol for biohackers. More human trials are needed before considering thymosin‑alpha‑1 as a longevity or performance supplement.
Summary
In a mouse study, adding the immune‑boosting peptide thymosin‑alpha‑1 to a heated chemotherapy wash (HIPEC) for colon cancer spread helped the mice live longer, but the peptide didn’t directly kill tumor cells—it worked by turning on a specific type of immune response.
Abstract
Heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is currently implemented in the treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal carcinoma (PM-CRC) origin. However, recurrence is common and the effectiveness of HIPEC has been questioned. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of thymosin alpha 1 (Tα1), an immunomodulatory molecule, as an adjuvant to HIPEC treatment. We developed an experimental model of HIPEC by the induction of PM-CRC in C57BL mice and intra-abdominal perfusion of mitomycin C (MMC). Mice were treated with Tα1 at 0.6 mg/kg for 5 days after HIPEC. Clinical and immunological parameters were compared between HIPEC and HIPEC + Tα1 groups. Treatment with Tα1 increased overall survival of mice compared to HIPEC treatment alone and sham-treated animals (16.1 ± 0.8 vs. 14.1 ± 0.6 and 11.8 ± 0.8, respectively, p = 0.02). Tα1 had no direct anti-tumor effect, as seen by lack of inhibition of tumor cell proliferation. Tα1 treatment induced a T helper (Th) 1 immune response in tumor metastases as evidenced by a significant increase of the Th1-specific markers IFN-γ and T-bet (1.21 ± 0.3 vs. 0.52 ± 0.08, p < 0.05; 0.88 ± 0.04 vs. 0.64 ± 0.14, p < 0.05, respectively). This Th1 skew was accompanied by increased CD8<sup>+</sup> infiltration into omental and visceral metastases by Tα1 treatment compared to sham and HIPEC-treated animals (21.24 ± 2.16 vs. 10.45 ± 0.89 and 7.7 ± 1.3, p < 0.001; 14.12 ± 1.54 vs. 12.12 ± 0.01 and 6.64 ± 0.87, p < 0.01, respectively). Tα1 augments the effect of HIPEC by the induction of a Th1 anti-tumor immune response. Further experiments should evaluate Tα1 and other novel immunomodulators in order to exploit the immunological opportunities created by HIPEC.
Study Information
pubmed
2022
2022-08-19T00:00:00.000Z
10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109166
10
24