Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Thymosin-alpha-1

Thymalfasin, Zadaxin, Thymosin α1

Quick Stats
Studies 759
Trials 63
Score 2
2022 pubmed 8 citations

Thymosin alpha1 use in adult COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis on clinical outcomes.

Shang. Weifeng W; Zhang. Bo B; Ren. Yali Y; Wang. Weina W; Zhou. Dengfeng D; Li. Yuanyuan Y

Key Findings

  • Overall mortality risk was unchanged (RR 1.03, p = 0.92).
  • In patients older than 60, thymosin‑alpha‑1 reduced death risk (RR 0.68, p < 0.0001).
  • In severe/critical COVID‑19 cases, it also lowered mortality (RR 0.66, p < 0.0001).
  • The pooled analysis showed high heterogeneity (I² = 90%).

Practical Outcomes

  • For most biohackers, using thymosin‑alpha‑1 as a COVID‑19 treatment isn’t supported by solid evidence. It might be worth exploring only in older or severely ill patients, but the data are limited and inconsistent, so it’s not a reliable protocol right now.

Summary

A big review looked at 9 studies with over 5,000 COVID‑19 patients and found that giving thymosin‑alpha‑1 didn’t lower death rates overall. Some smaller groups – older people, severe cases, or trials with few women – seemed to benefit, but the overall data are mixed and not strong enough to recommend it for most patients.

Abstract

Thymosin alpha1 (Ta1) is widely used to treat patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), however, its effect remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of Ta1 as a COVID-19 therapy. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, Web of Science, and the reference lists of relevant articles were searched to identify eligible studies. Assessment of heterogeneity was done using the I-squared (I<sup>2</sup>) test and random/fixed effect analysis was done to determine the risk ratio (RR). We polled the data related to mortality mainly by using Review Manager 5.4. Predefined subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were also performed. A total of 9 studies were included, on a total of 5352 (Ta1&#xa0;=&#xa0;1152, control&#xa0;=&#xa0;4200) patient outcomes. Meta-analysis results indicated that Ta1 therapy had no statistically significant effect on mortality [RR 1.03 (0.60, 1.75), p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.92, I<sup>2</sup>&#xa0;=&#xa0;90&#xa0;%]. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the beneficial effect in mortality was associated with mean age&#xff1e;60&#xa0;years in the T&#x3b1;1 group [RR 0.68 (0.58, 0.78), p&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;0.0000.1, I<sup>2</sup>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0&#xa0;%], the proportion of female&#xa0;&#x2264;&#xa0;40&#xa0;% in the T&#x3b1;1 group [RR 0.67 (0.58, 0.77), p&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;0.0000.1, I<sup>2</sup>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0&#xa0;%], and severe/critical COVID-19 patients [RR 0.66 (0.57, 0.76), p&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;0.0000.1, I<sup>2</sup>&#xa0;=&#xa0;0&#xa0;%]. Sensitivity analysis further demonstrated the results to be robust. The results of this meta-analysis do not support the use of Ta1 in hospitalized adult COVID-19 patients.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2022

Date

2022-12-13T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109584

Citations

8

References

33