Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Thymosin-alpha-1

Thymalfasin, Zadaxin, Thymosin α1

Quick Stats
Studies 759
Trials 63
Score 3
2021 pubmed 14 citations

Efficacy of Thymosin Alpha 1 in the Treatment of COVID-19: A Multicenter Cohort Study.

Liu. Jiao J; Shen. Yanfei Y; Wen. Zhenliang Z; Xu. Qianghong Q; Wu. Zhixiong Z; Feng. Huibin H; Li. Zhongyi Z; Dong. Xuan X; Huang. Sisi S; Guo. Jun J; Zhang. Lidi L; Chen. Yizhu Y; Li. Wenzhe W; Zhu. Wei W; Du. Hangxiang H; Liu. Yongan Y; Wang. Tao T; Chen. Limin L; Teboul. Jean-Louis JL; Annane. Djillali D; Chen. Dechang D

Key Findings

  • Thymosin‑alpha‑1 patients had higher non‑recovery, mortality, intubation, ARDS, and AKI rates than controls
  • Adjusted analysis showed a 1.5‑fold higher odds of not recovering when using thymosin‑alpha‑1
  • The negative effect was strongest in patients with high SOFA scores, ICU admission, low oxygen levels, or late start of the peptide

Practical Outcomes

  • For self‑experimenters and biohackers, thymosin‑alpha‑1 does not appear to help COVID‑19 and may actually increase the risk of severe outcomes. It’s advisable to avoid using this peptide for COVID‑19 treatment, especially in moderate‑to‑severe cases or when started late.

Summary

A big study in China looked at people with COVID‑19 who got the peptide thymosin‑alpha‑1 and found they did worse than those who didn’t get it. They were more likely to stay sick, die, need a ventilator, develop lung injury, kidney injury, and spend longer in the ICU. Starting the peptide later or using it in very sick patients made the risk even higher.

Abstract

Thymosin alpha 1 (T&#x3b1;1) is widely used to treat patients with COVID-19 in China; however, its efficacy remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of T&#x3b1;1 as a COVID-19 therapy. We performed a multicenter cohort study in five tertiary hospitals in the Hubei province of China between December 2019 and March 2020. The patient non-recovery rate was used as the primary outcome. All crude outcomes, including non-recovery rate (65/306 <i>vs.</i> 290/1,976, <i>p</i> = 0.003), in-hospital mortality rate (62/306 <i>vs.</i> 271/1,976, <i>p</i> = 0.003), intubation rate (31/306 <i>vs.</i> 106/1,976, <i>p</i> = 0.001), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) incidence (104/306 <i>vs.</i> 499/1,976, <i>p</i> = 0.001), acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence (26/306 <i>vs.</i> 66/1,976, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (14.9 &#xb1; 12.7 <i>vs.</i> 8.7 &#xb1; 8.2 days, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), were significantly higher in the T&#x3b1;1 treatment group. After adjusting for confounding factors, T&#x3b1;1 use was found to be significantly associated with a higher non-recovery rate than non-T&#x3b1;1 use (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1, <i>p</i> = 0.028). An increased risk of non-recovery rate associated with T&#x3b1;1 use was observed in the patient subgroups with maximum sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores &#x2265;2 (OR 2.0, 95%CI 1.4-2.9, <i>p</i> = 0.024), a record of ICU admission (OR 5.4, 95%CI 2.1-14.0, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and lower PaO2/FiO2 values (OR 1.9, 95%CI 1.1-3.4, <i>p</i> = 0.046). Furthermore, later initiation of T&#x3b1;1 use was associated with a higher non-recovery rate. T&#x3b1;1 use in COVID-19 patients was associated with an increased non-recovery rate, especially in those with greater disease severity.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2021

Date

2021-08-02T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.3389/fimmu.2021.673693

Citations

14

References

40