Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Thymosin-alpha-1

Thymalfasin, Zadaxin, Thymosin α1

Quick Stats
Studies 759
Trials 63
Score 3
2023 pubmed 3 citations

Association between pretreatment lymphocyte count and efficacy of immune-enhancing therapy in acute necrotising pancreatitis: a post-hoc analysis of the multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled TRACE trial.

Ke. Lu L; Mao. Wenjian W; Shao. Fang F; Zhou. Jing J; Xu. Minyi M; Chen. Tao T; Liu. Yuxiu Y; Tong. Zhihui Z; Windsor. John J; Ma. Penglin P; Li. Weiqin W

Key Findings

  • Thymosin‑alpha‑1 reduced infected pancreatic necrosis in patients with baseline absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) ≄0.8 ×10âč/L
  • The strongest effect was seen in the ALC range of 0.79‑2.00 ×10âč/L
  • No significant benefit was observed in patients with lower baseline lymphocyte counts

Practical Outcomes

  • If you’re considering thymosin‑alpha‑1 for immune support, check your lymphocyte count first—higher counts may mean the peptide works better. The trial used 1.6 mg subcutaneously twice daily for a week, then once daily for another week, but it was in a severe disease setting, so apply caution to healthy self‑experimentation.

Summary

The study found that the immune‑boosting peptide thymosin‑alpha‑1 can lower the chance of infected pancreatic tissue death in severe pancreatitis, but only in patients who already have a decent number of lymphocytes (a type of white blood cell). People with low lymphocyte counts didn’t see the benefit. This suggests the drug works best when the immune system isn’t already weakened.

Abstract

Immune-enhancing thymosin alpha 1 (T&#x3b1;1) therapy may reduce infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) in acute necrotising pancreatitis (ANP). However, the efficacy might be impacted by lymphocyte count due to the pharmacological action of T&#x3b1;1. In this <i>post-hoc</i> analysis, we tested the hypothesis that pre-treatment absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) determines whether patients with ANP benefit from T&#x3b1;1 therapy. A <i>post-hoc</i> analysis of data from a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial testing the efficacy of T&#x3b1;1 therapy in patients with predicted severe ANP was performed. Patients from 16 hospitals of China were randomised to receive a subcutaneous injection of T&#x3b1;1 1.6&#xa0;mg every 12&#xa0;h for the frst 7 days and 1.6&#xa0;mg once a day for the following 7 days or a matching placebo during the same period. Patients who discontinued the T&#x3b1;1 regimen prematurely were excluded. Three subgroup analyses were conducted using the baseline ALC (at randomisation), and the group allocation was maintained as intention-to-treat. The primary outcome was the incidence of IPN 90 days after randomisation. The fitted logistic regression model was applied to identify the range of baseline ALC where T&#x3b1;1 therapy could exert a maximum effect. The original trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02473406. Between March 18, 2017, and December 10, 2020, a total of 508 patients were randomised in the original trial, and 502 were involved in this analysis, with 248 in the T&#x3b1;1 group and 254 in the placebo group. Across the three subgroups, there was a uniform trend toward more significant treatment effects in patients with higher baseline ALC. Within the subgroup of patients with baseline ALC&#x2265;0.8&#xa0;&#xd7;&#xa0;10&#x2c6;9/L (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;290), the T&#x3b1;1 therapy significantly reduced the risk of IPN (covariate adjusted risk difference,&#xa0;-0.12; 95% CI,&#xa0;-0.21,-0.02; p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.015). Patients with baseline ALC between 0.79 and 2.00&#xa0;&#xd7;&#xa0;10&#x2c6;9/L benefited most from the T&#x3b1;1 therapy in reducing IPN (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;263). This <i>post-hoc</i> analysis found that the efficacy of immune-enhancing T&#x3b1;1 therapy on the incidence of IPN may be associated with pretreatment lymphocyte count in patients with acute necrotising pancreatitis. National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2023

Date

2023-03-24T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101915

Citations

3

References

27