Menu
Peptide Database
Results
No peptides found
Featured

Use search to browse all 100+ peptides

Thymosin-alpha-1

Thymalfasin, Zadaxin, Thymosin α1

Quick Stats
Studies 759
Trials 63
Score 2
2016 pubmed 49 citations

The efficacy of thymosin α1 as immunomodulatory treatment for sepsis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Liu. Fang F; Wang. Hong-Mei HM; Wang. Tiansheng T; Zhang. Ya-Mei YM; Zhu. Xi X

Key Findings

  • Mortality was reduced (RR 0.59) in patients receiving thymosin‑alpha‑1 compared to controls
  • Once‑daily dosing improved APACHE II scores (SMD ‑0.80) but twice‑daily did not
  • Immune markers like HLA‑DR, CD3, CD4, IL‑6, IL‑10 and TNF‑α were favorably modulated
  • No significant impact on ICU length of stay, multiple organ failure incidence, or ventilation duration

Practical Outcomes

  • The data hint that thymosin‑alpha‑1 could be a useful immune‑boosting add‑on in severe infections, but because the trials are small and methodologically weak, it’s not a reliable protocol for everyday health optimization. Biohackers should wait for higher‑quality research before incorporating it into regular regimens.

Summary

A review of 19 small trials suggests that giving the peptide thymosin‑alpha‑1 to people with severe infection (sepsis) may lower death rates and improve a key severity score when taken once a day, while also boosting some immune markers. However, the studies are low quality, the benefits on ICU stay or organ failure are unclear, and the evidence isn’t strong enough for routine use.

Abstract

Thymosin α1 (Tα1) as immunomodulatory treatment is supposed to be beneficial for the sepsis patients by regulating T cell subsets and inflammatory mediators. However, limited by the small sample size and the poor study design, the persuasive power of the single clinical studies is weak. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the impact of Tα1 on the sepsis patients. We searched for the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CBM, VIP, CNKI, WANFANG, Igaku Chuo Zasshi (ICHUSHI) and Korean literature databases reporting the effects of Tα1 on outcomes in sepsis patients. Among 444 related articles, 19 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met our inclusion criteria. Mortality events were reported in 10 RCTs included 530 patients, and the meta-analysis showed significant decrease in Tα1 group compared with control group (RR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.45 to 0.77, p = 0.0001). The subgroup analysis showed no difference between the two dosages (RR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.43 to 0.81; RR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.35 to 0.98, respectively). In 9 RCTs, with a total of 489 patients, Tα1 administered once per day decrease APACHE II score significantly (SMD -0.80, 95 % CI -1.14 to -0.47, p < 0.0001) while Tα1 twice per day showed no effect (SMD 0.30, 95 % CI-0.10 to 0.70, p = 0.14). However, the length of ICU stay, the incidence of multiple organ failure (MOF) and duration of mechanical ventilation were not significantly affected by Tα1 treatment (SMD -0.52, 95 % CI -1.06 to 0.11, p = 0.06; SMD -0.49, 95 % CI -1.09 to 0.11, p = 0.11; SMD -0.37, 95 % CI -0.90 to 0.17, p = 0.17, respectively). As to the immunological indicators, the level of HLA-DR were increased by Tα1 (SMD 1.23, 95 % CI 0.28 to 2.18, p = 0.01) according to the pooled analysis of 8 studies involving 721 patients. Lymphocyte subsets CD3, CD4 and cytokines IL-6, IL-10 and TNF-α were also beneficially affected by Tα1 treatment. Tα1 may be beneficial to sepsis patients in reducing mortality and modulating inflammation reactions. However, the quality of evidence supporting the effectiveness is low considering the small sample sizes and inadequate adherence to standardized reporting guidelines for RCTs among the included studies.

Study Information

Provider

pubmed

Year

2016

Date

2016-09-15T00:00:00.000Z

DOI

10.1186/s12879-016-1823-5

Citations

49

References

62